freddyboston
Brilliant_Rock
- Joined
- Aug 2, 2023
- Messages
- 635
Yes...Ancient Diamonds have Trigons.....
and souls
But you've already been given a factual response numerous times in numerous threads.
Is there a different way that the same answer needs to be worded which will provide you full appeasement?
I'm genuinely confused why you continue this crusade for an answer that has already been given to not only you, but the entire world:
From a different GIA article...the wording that you're looking for is right there: three rough diamonds each from a different origin:
![]()
No, DejaWiz, I’m good, thanks.
Excellent, glad that you found peace about it, Chelsea Palmer - your fantastic and perfectly synthesized human grown diamond is perfect: clean HPHT material, amazing cut precision, GIA graded with the AGS addendum showing ASET imaging - there was a lot of painstaking talent and pure soul poured into growing, cutting, and polishing your diamond...and it will soon truly be a treasure now that GIA will be dumbing themselves down on their upcoming lacking approach to LGD grading.
To be clear, I was never not at peace with my…my…well, I don’t know what to call it any longer. I freaking LOVE it, even though I don’t what “it” is
Ooooh, the natural diamond has what looks like alien hieroglyphs on the upper part and what looks like a 6-fingered hand pointing to a cloud on the lower. Proof that aliens exist!!
Pie anyone?
So a diamond grown in a lab is a lab-grown diamond. Or a synthetic diamond. Or a man-made diamond. A poster referred to LGDs as knockoffs and that’s where I was confused. Wasn’t sure how something called a diamond could be a knock-off of a diamond.It's a lab/synthetic diamond. Like how we explained synthetic gemstones. If you drop the prefix then it becomes misleading.
So a diamond grown in a lab is a lab-grown diamond. Or a synthetic diamond. Or a man-made diamond. A poster referred to LGDs as knockoffs and that’s where I was confused. Wasn’t sure how something called a diamond could be a knock-off of a diamond.
But you've already been given a factual response numerous times in numerous threads.
Is there a different way that the same answer needs to be worded which will provide you full appeasement?
I'm genuinely confused why you continue this crusade for an answer that has already been given to not only you, but the entire world:
From a different GIA article...the wording that you're looking for is right there: three rough diamonds each from a different origin:
![]()
So we have confirmed a lab-grown diamond is a diamond.
The second part is about provenance. It matters to some and doesn't matter to others. No matter what examples we give it won't satisfy you. Just enjoy what you have and try not to defend it here.
This is a very interesting picture, I had not seen synthetic rough before. All three have been carved/cut in some way already I guess. This image minimizes the apparent differences in a way that feels intentional. I'd be curious to see all three in their "rough rough" forms right out of the vat/ground.