New to PS and seek advice. I bought an uncertified diamond on the internet with the following specifications.
Diamond Weight: 1.30 CT
Diamond Shape: Round
Diamond Color: H
Diamond Clarity: Si3-I1
MAKE/CUT: Ideal
SHINE/SPARKLE [1-10]: 10
SCINTILLATION/FIRE[1-10]: 10
FLUORESCENCE: None
I initially thought the stone looked ok. My fiancee and I took a diamond class from a certified gia gemologist with a degree in structural crystalogy. During the class, we looked at an 11 1.1 ct diamond under a 40x microscope and couldn''t help notice how much nicer this stone was then ours. Without telling the instructor what clarity the diamond I purchased was suppose to be, I ask her if she would look at it. After spend some time reviewing it she said with confidence it was an I3. I asked her how subjective the grading is, she said she would place her reputation that any of the major labs would all classify it as an I3. She said even EGL and then laughed. I guess an inside joke within the industry.
I contacted the seller with my findings. I wanted to believe that maybe this was an honest mistake and he shipped us the wrong diamond. This was not the case and he strongly stood my his assessment. He offered me a full refund which I do appreciate but I do not feel this is a satisfactory resolution. I contacted a lawyer friend and they said that I would have a very strong case for consumer fraud but lawsuits are expensive and never fun and recommended I take the refund. Isn''t this the assumption that the seller counts on to make money. Overstate a diamond and make money on the ignorant, break even on the less ignorant. I feel a moral obligation to make this seller pay and to prevent others from being ripped off. I have legal insurance from my work and contacted them regarding coverage. As long as the value of the suit exceeds max amount for small claims, I have full coverage at no cost.
I would appreciate any advice or feedback from the members of this forum.
-Matt
Diamond Weight: 1.30 CT
Diamond Shape: Round
Diamond Color: H
Diamond Clarity: Si3-I1
MAKE/CUT: Ideal
SHINE/SPARKLE [1-10]: 10
SCINTILLATION/FIRE[1-10]: 10
FLUORESCENCE: None
I initially thought the stone looked ok. My fiancee and I took a diamond class from a certified gia gemologist with a degree in structural crystalogy. During the class, we looked at an 11 1.1 ct diamond under a 40x microscope and couldn''t help notice how much nicer this stone was then ours. Without telling the instructor what clarity the diamond I purchased was suppose to be, I ask her if she would look at it. After spend some time reviewing it she said with confidence it was an I3. I asked her how subjective the grading is, she said she would place her reputation that any of the major labs would all classify it as an I3. She said even EGL and then laughed. I guess an inside joke within the industry.
I contacted the seller with my findings. I wanted to believe that maybe this was an honest mistake and he shipped us the wrong diamond. This was not the case and he strongly stood my his assessment. He offered me a full refund which I do appreciate but I do not feel this is a satisfactory resolution. I contacted a lawyer friend and they said that I would have a very strong case for consumer fraud but lawsuits are expensive and never fun and recommended I take the refund. Isn''t this the assumption that the seller counts on to make money. Overstate a diamond and make money on the ignorant, break even on the less ignorant. I feel a moral obligation to make this seller pay and to prevent others from being ripped off. I have legal insurance from my work and contacted them regarding coverage. As long as the value of the suit exceeds max amount for small claims, I have full coverage at no cost.
I would appreciate any advice or feedback from the members of this forum.
-Matt