- Joined
- Apr 30, 2005
- Messages
- 33,296
Certain locations of origin, like Kashmir, can dramatically increase the value of a gem.
In another thread someone bought a ruby and the seller stated, in writing, it was from Burma.
If the buyer later (past the refund period) sends the ruby to a reputable lab, like AGL, and it is determined to not be from Burma but rather a location that makes it less valuable is the seller liable?
I would think if the buyer chose to buy a stone with no report from an independent gem lab they'd have no recourse.
Sure the vendor should not have claimed Burma without the authority of a report.
This is why independent grading labs exist.
The seller may have trusted their source about the Burma origin.
This question also applies to everything else too, gem type, weight, treatment, color etc.
Seems to me if you buy something with no lab report you don't have a leg to stand on, legally.
What I think does not matter.
What is customary (buyer and vendor expectations) and what are the laws about this?
In another thread someone bought a ruby and the seller stated, in writing, it was from Burma.
If the buyer later (past the refund period) sends the ruby to a reputable lab, like AGL, and it is determined to not be from Burma but rather a location that makes it less valuable is the seller liable?
I would think if the buyer chose to buy a stone with no report from an independent gem lab they'd have no recourse.
Sure the vendor should not have claimed Burma without the authority of a report.
This is why independent grading labs exist.
The seller may have trusted their source about the Burma origin.
This question also applies to everything else too, gem type, weight, treatment, color etc.
Seems to me if you buy something with no lab report you don't have a leg to stand on, legally.
What I think does not matter.
What is customary (buyer and vendor expectations) and what are the laws about this?