How are these proportions?

[Dmndsr4evr11]

@bludiva and all,

What do you guys think of these proportions? Thank you!!

 

[bludiva]

I'm not the proportions guru and don't want to steer you wrong.... paging @lovedogs @OoohShiny @whitewave

 

[lovedogs]

Those look good, and if they are a WF ACA (which I suspect they are), then the stone is almost guaranteed to be outstanding

 

[whitewave]

Very nice. Agree with above, seems like a super ideal

 

[bmfang]

That is definitely a WF stone. Proportions are bang on the money in my books. Good stone!

 

[diamondseeker2006]

Yep, great numbers!

 

[Dancing Fire]

Love it!

 

[Dmndsr4evr11]

@bludiva @lovedogs @diamondseeker2006, @bmfang @Dancing Fire @whitewave - thank you all! Yes, it is a WF ACA. Just wondering as some people have mentioned preference for certain numbers even with ACAs. White brilliance versus more fire. I know it’s personal preference. Why does one choose one versus the other? Why can’t we have the best of both? . Thanks again.

 

[diamondseeker2006]

Truly, ACA measurements are within a small range. I've seen many of their stones and it would be really hard to say that any are better than others. You simply are not going to see much (if any) difference in fire, so the main thing is to choose the size, color, and clarity you like within budget!

 

[lovedogs]

Truly, ACA measurements are within a small range. I've seen many of their stones and it would be really hard to say that any are better than others. You simply are not going to see much difference in fire, so the main thing is to choose the size, color, and clarity you like within budget!

Exactly.

 

[Dmndsr4evr11]

Truly, ACA measurements are within a small range. I've seen many of their stones and it would be really hard to say that any are better than others. You simply are not going to see much (if any) difference in fire, so the main thing is to choose the size, color, and clarity you like within budget!

Thanks, @diamondseeker2006. I didn’t even nitpick choosing my first ACA thinking that it’s an ACA, I’m sure it will be awesome then I read people wanting more specific ACA proportions.

 

[lovedogs]

Thanks, @diamondseeker2006. I didn’t even nitpick choosing my first ACA thinking that it’s an ACA, I’m sure it will be awesome then I read people wanting more specific ACA proportions.

Yeah, I think people sometimes get bogged down in details that are almost entirely a "mind clean" issue vs something visible to the naked eye.

 

[bludiva]

@bludiva @lovedogs @diamondseeker2006, @bmfang @Dancing Fire @whitewave - thank you all! Yes, it is a WF ACA. Just wondering as some people have mentioned preference for certain numbers even with ACAs. White brilliance versus more fire. I know it’s personal preference. Why does one choose one versus the other? Why can’t we have the best of both? . Thanks again.

I think you should get the best of all worlds with this. Sparkle, fire, and tiny table to boot. Post pics if you get it!

 

[Dmndsr4evr11]

Thanks, @bludiva.

 

[Dancing Fire]

- thank you all! Yes, it is a WF ACA. Just wondering as some people have mentioned preference for certain numbers even with ACAs. White brilliance versus more fire. I know it’s personal preference. Why does one choose one versus the other? Why can’t we have the best of both? . Thanks again.

.. My personal preference is for a small table (54-55%) + a high crown (15.5-15.8%) IMO = more fire. If you prefer a more balanced stone then go with (56-56.5%) table + a 14.8-15.2% crown.

 

[Dmndsr4evr11]

.. My personal preference is for a small table (54-55%) + a high crown (15.5-15.8%) IMO = more fire. If you prefer a more balanced stone then go with (56-56.5%) table + a 14.8-15.2% crown.

Thanks, @Dancing Fire -I’ll keep these proportions in mind .