Help with ASET and Idealscope

[KalebK]

Can you please share your opinion?

 

[KalebK]

Are the lighter areas of red in the center anything to worry about? I think dark red would be better, but will these areas stick out?

 

[Karl_K]

The back lighting on the images is over bright and there is some tilt.
Every RB has some minor leakage in the 1% to2% range that causes them to do this when the back light is over bright.
This image shows a virtual diamond with cherry proportions with just back lighting


The ASET shows some painting/digging but not enough to be overly harmful but enough to kick it out of the very top end.
The diamond passes both tests.
What are the numbers from the report?

 

[KalebK]

Thank you, Karl! Is painting/digging represented on grading reports? I noticed the girdle looked a little "wavey" on the report below.

1.74 carat round
VS2
J color (going to be set in a yellow gold solitaire ring)
1.5 HCA
58.5% table
61.1% depth
35 crown angle
40.7 pavilion angle
14.5% crown
43% pavilion
medium to slightly thick girdle
no culet
no fluorescence

 

[flyingpig]

Which lab is the report from?

 

[KalebK]

The report is from IGI

 

[KalebK]

There's a cloud at 7 o'clock near the girdle; could the lighter red areas on that side of the diamond be an attempt to cut out as much of that cloud inclusion as possible?

 

[Karl_K]

There's a cloud at 7 o'clock near the girdle; could the lighter red areas on that side of the diamond be an attempt to cut out as much of that cloud inclusion as possible?

No, its the back lighting.
Its very common for vendors not to have their photo setup properly dialed in.

 

[Karl_K]

The report is from IGI

IGI reports are not considered as accurate as GIA/AGS reports.
IGI international has a slightly better reputation than IGI USA.

 

[Karl_K]

Thank you, Karl! Is painting/digging represented on grading reports? I noticed the girdle looked a little "wavey" on the report below.

1.74 carat round
VS2
J color (going to be set in a yellow gold solitaire ring)
1.5 HCA
58.5% table
61.1% depth
35 crown angle
40.7 pavilion angle
14.5% crown
43% pavilion
medium to slightly thick girdle
no culet
no fluorescence

No it isn't represented on the grading report other than the computer generated ASET on AGS reports and then the accuracy of the representation is questionable.
The numbers are in line with the images.