FinanceMan1212
Rough_Rock
- Joined
- Aug 16, 2021
- Messages
- 36
I prefer an LGF between 75-76% for the bigger/chunkier arrows that result.
Good to know. I've read that 77%> gives you the best "fire" although I think the 2ct has better fire.
I prefer an LGF between 75-76% for the bigger/chunkier arrows that result.
Both are fine cut wise.
Your running into bs internet whacked out info syndrome.
There are a lot of people out there that think they know everything and post bogus webpages to convince others they are experts.
So you think both diamonds are exactly the same? No preference?
the are both well cut with known good angle combinations backed by images.
In an ideal world aset or IS images would be available but there is enough info.
Ask about transparency for any lab stone.
looking at it is the only test for it.Is there a certain measurement they do for transparency or is it as simple as them just telling me it's ideal transparent?
looking at it is the only test for it.
So they need to check and tell you.
nopersAnd there is nothing to be worried about with the 60.5 depth?
Although I like the bigger spread of the 2.14ct better, I do like that the 2.0ct appears to have slightly better symmetry precision and less pronounced CVD striations (especially in the Fire videos). I would choose the 2.0ct between these two.
But, it's a tough call.
You're welcome. Jon (Rhino) is as selfless as they come when sharing knowledge with the world.
I decided on the 2ct. It's 1k cheaper as well.