Date: 2/2/2006 11:08:54 AM
Author: mrssalvo
ussd..it looks like you are going to need a certain size stone to look propotionate to the side pears. i''m not sure $1500 will get you there..I would suggest spending less on a setting and putting more $ into the stone..
Date: 2/2/2006 5:09:53 PM
Author: pebbles
Here''s a thread where the center stone is .54ct and the side pears are around .20ct each:
https://www.pricescope.com/community/threads/photos-of-my-e-ring.39641/
I think your ring will be gorgeous!
Date: 2/2/2006 5:26:32 PM
Author: pebbles
Mrssalvo -- I too didn''t think the .5 would look right with the pears until I came across the other thread.![]()
Date: 2/2/2006 5:30:54 PM
Author: mrssalvo
Date: 2/2/2006 5:26:32 PM
Author: pebbles
Mrssalvo -- I too didn''t think the .5 would look right with the pears until I came across the other thread.![]()
see, i learn something new here everyday. i''m so glad you noticed it b/c now ussd can get a really good idea of how his ring will look.![]()
Too bad there isn''t an example with round sides... IMO, the pears would look larger and fit nicely with the tappered shank. But an aparently closely related version with rounds (below) doesn''t look half bad either.Date: 2/4/2006 11:53:16 AM
Author: ussd
Now I''m really torn. Any other thoughts???