Agree with this! I’d pass unless I could get other images. I’d pass anyway personally because of crown angle.Large table..59%
The crown angle seems a bit too shallow. The girdle is also a bit too thick for my taste as well.
Do you have other images (ASET, etc?)
My budget around £4500 Uk sterling. 1.1 or above. Colour J. Clarity SI1 or above. Eye clean if poss.
Thanks.
Medium is no reason for concern. Sometimes, diamonds may be affected by strong fluorescence, but even that needs to be examined on stone-by-stone basis, it is not a universal rule.Should florescence be none or faint or does it not matter?
Medium is no reason for concern. Sometimes, diamonds may be affected by strong fluorescence, but even that needs to be examined on stone-by-stone basis, it is not a universal rule.
That’s a pretty stone! Nice proportions and a high crown.Whats peoples views on this particular diamond?
https://www.bluenile.com/uk/diamond...NDS&track=viewDiamondDetails&catalogView=true
This is a really great point. We don't know the measurements of the original stone in question, but given it has a 4% girdle thickness, it may actually face up smaller than another stone of similar measurement... you are so right in mentioning that a stone a little smaller in carat weight may have the same measurement of the one in question (and would come in at a price-point below the magic number!).I think that limiting results only to 1.1ct + hurts your search. There will be negligible difference between 1.1ct and other stones that are slightly smaller in carat weight. The proportions and spread are important. Here is a stone a bit above budget with a beautiful make: 1.06 J VVS1 while the clarity is a bit of an overkill, it’s a gorgeous stone. Also, make sure that you sign up for newsletters to receive £75 off.
ooh, yes... really nice pick!!!That’s a pretty stone! Nice proportions and a high crown.