Help me pick between these two

[mrpenny]

Hi all,

Went to Tiffany today and I walked away with 2 classic tiffany setting lab reports. Help me pick / reinforce my decision please!

Both are exc exc exc and they differ in only .05 cw. Figures are separated by commas (1.06 c on the left, 1.01 on right).

1.06's measurements
6.53-6.56 x 4.04 mm
$13,600

1.01's measurements
6.38-6.41 x 3.99 mm
$12,900

total depth % = 61.7,62.4
table size % = 58,58
crown height % = 15,14.9
crown angle = 35.2, 35.3
pavilion depth % = 43.5, 43.6
pavilion depth angle = 41.1, 41.2
girdle thickness = medium, medium to slightly thick
girdle finish = faceted, faceted
culet = none, none
lower half length = 80, 75
star length = 55, 55
clarity plot (same)

HCA for 1.06:
Selected: 61.7% depth, 58% table, 35.2° crown angle, 41.1° pavilion angle
The result is for a symmetrical diamond with a medium girdle and very good polish
HCA scores were adjusted Dec. 15, 2001 and Feb. 6, 2003.



Factor Grade
Light Return Very Good
Fire Good
Scintillation Good
Spread
or diameter for weight Very Good
Total Visual Performance 3.5

HCA for 1.01:
Selected: 62.4% depth, 58% table, 35.3° crown angle, 41.2° pavilion angle
The result is for a symmetrical diamond with a medium girdle and very good polish
HCA scores were adjusted Dec. 15, 2001 and Feb. 6, 2003.



Factor Grade
Light Return Good
Fire Good
Scintillation Good
Spread
or diameter for weight Very Good
Total Visual Performance 4.3

I have one picked out, but I don't want to taint anyone's opinion!

Thanks in advance

 

[JulieN]

Hi mrpenney! Once you've seen the diamonds, the opinion of a bunch of strangers on the Internet who haven't seen them is barely relevant. By the numbers, the first one might be nicer, but your opinion counts more.

 

[Roxy]

Hi mrpenney! Once you've seen the diamonds, the opinion of a bunch of strangers on the Internet who haven't seen them is barely relevant. By the numbers, the first one might be nicer, but your opinion counts more.

Couldn't agree more!