Wholovesskunks
Shiny_Rock
- Joined
- May 18, 2017
- Messages
- 169
The first is 2.02 K/IF emerald.
The second is 2.53 L/IF emerald.
Photos for both are attached.
The first is the 2.02 and the second is 2.53. Price difference is negligible.
Both are listed as Excellent cut stones.
The first appears to be elongated more than the other but the length to width ratios are only .03 difference. 1.32 v 1.35
There seems to be more light leakage with the first and more light blockage with the second.
Help! I'm notorious for going with size over clarity or color. I care about cut most though.




The second is 2.53 L/IF emerald.
Photos for both are attached.
The first is the 2.02 and the second is 2.53. Price difference is negligible.
Both are listed as Excellent cut stones.
The first appears to be elongated more than the other but the length to width ratios are only .03 difference. 1.32 v 1.35
There seems to be more light leakage with the first and more light blockage with the second.
Help! I'm notorious for going with size over clarity or color. I care about cut most though.



