Make sure you get the stone nice and clean before you inspect it. The pictures earlier seemed to show a film on the diamond, possibly from handling while placing the diamond into the holder. Oil from your fingers will do that (especially if you use hand lotion). Judging from the cert I would not think the stone would look as cloudy as it did in the holder and even in the hearts and arrows pics.busines4u|1439565221|3914479 said:Yes I took the diamond outside and looked at it in the sunlight. I also stepped back away from their counter inside to view it outside of their bright spot lights. Everything appeared to check out okay!
I did not take it into the shade though outside to see how it looked. I am going back yet again tonight with my mother as she wants to check it out. I will certainly be sure to find some shade to see what it looks like.
Texas Leaguer|1439565904|3914487 said:Make sure you get the stone nice and clean before you inspect it. The pictures earlier seemed to show a film on the diamond, possibly from handling while placing the diamond into the holder. Oil from your fingers will do that (especially if you use hand lotion). Judging from the cert I would not think the stone would look as cloudy as it did in the holder and even in the hearts and arrows pics.busines4u|1439565221|3914479 said:Yes I took the diamond outside and looked at it in the sunlight. I also stepped back away from their counter inside to view it outside of their bright spot lights. Everything appeared to check out okay!
I did not take it into the shade though outside to see how it looked. I am going back yet again tonight with my mother as she wants to check it out. I will certainly be sure to find some shade to see what it looks like.
D_|1439571639|3914530 said:Sounds like a girdle reflection.
D_|1440313664|3917926 said:It looks really good
Here is a short thread where this question is discussed:busines4u|1440415094|3918391 said:D_|1440313664|3917926 said:It looks really good
Thanks for the feedback! Is there any concern that this is a "computer generated" image of the diamond and not a physical representation of the diamond itself?
VRBeauty|1440428086|3918487 said:I'd be concerned about those floating arms getting caught in things - like a very nice sweater, for example. Could the end of each arm be "tacked" to the basket somehow?
Texas Leaguer|1440428541|3918493 said:Here is a short thread where this question is discussed:busines4u|1440415094|3918391 said:D_|1440313664|3917926 said:It looks really good
Thanks for the feedback! Is there any concern that this is a "computer generated" image of the diamond and not a physical representation of the diamond itself?
[URL='https://www.pricescope.com/community/threads/aset-included-in-ags-certificate.215530/']https://www.pricescope.com/community/threads/aset-included-in-ags-certificate.215530/[/URL]
Coralfish|1440429310|3918508 said:Hi,
As you are not yet tied into the diamond I feel it is okay to mention that in every picture it has a greasy/cloudy look. Is the diamond clean? I am still worried about 'clouds not shown'.
Please have them ultrasonic the diamond, then take it outside/inside next to a GIA/AGS VS1 or higher.
Then and only then a slight cloudiness may show up. It is not always obvious without a comparable to a layperson's eye.
How much is the Jared setting?
With a 9.5k budget and limited time I would buy this
http://www.jamesallen.com/loose-diamonds/round-cut/1.36-carat-h-color-vs2-clarity-ideal-cut-sku-584228
get it discounted to 9k with the advantage discount (just ask in chat or on the phone), and set it with something like this. You can ask them if they'll change the bezel to a claw prong.
http://www.jamesallen.com/engagement-rings/tension/14k-white-gold-pave-bypass-bezel-set-diamond-engagement-ring-item-9225
or
http://www.jamesallen.com/engagement-rings/solitaire/18k-white-gold-regal-halo-engagement-ring-item-22555
Coralfish|1440429863|3918520 said:Crikey, I read that price wrong! Sorry, I thought it said 9.2k and it is 9.9k. Oops
In that case, I'd go for this one with the advantage discount
http://www.jamesallen.com/loose-diamonds/round-cut/1.20-carat-h-color-vs1-clarity-excellent-cut-sku-534386
With this
http://www.jamesallen.com/engagement-rings/pave/14k-white-gold-modern-bypass-micropave-diamond-engagement-ring-item-50669
And puts the whole shebang under budget.
Re appraiser - please
i) do as above with the ultrasonic'd diamond
ii) make sure you are still within the return period and they are not just stringing you out timewise till you can't return it anymore.
iii) if diamond is still not hazy or cloudy next to a vs1 or higher (make sure the comparison diamond has negligible flouresence, just to mitigate for any extra effects) then possibly take it to an appraiser.
I don't feel comfortable that you basically only have one diamond to pick from. I feel you feel slightly railroaded and you shouldn't feel like that.
Normally this comment alone does not raise red flags for transparency issues. But since cloud is listed first under keys to symbols, it is also a grade setting feature. It may not be a problem, but with the combination of the way the cert reads with some of the photos you have posted, you definitely want a specific opinion on the transparency aspect from a qualified, independent appraiser.busines4u|1440429905|3918521 said:Coralfish|1440429310|3918508 said:Hi,
As you are not yet tied into the diamond I feel it is okay to mention that in every picture it has a greasy/cloudy look. Is the diamond clean? I am still worried about 'clouds not shown'.
Please have them ultrasonic the diamond, then take it outside/inside next to a GIA/AGS VS1 or higher.
Then and only then a slight cloudiness may show up. It is not always obvious without a comparable to a layperson's eye.
How much is the Jared setting?
With a 9.5k budget and limited time I would buy this
http://www.jamesallen.com/loose-diamonds/round-cut/1.36-carat-h-color-vs2-clarity-ideal-cut-sku-584228
get it discounted to 9k with the advantage discount (just ask in chat or on the phone), and set it with something like this. You can ask them if they'll change the bezel to a claw prong.
http://www.jamesallen.com/engagement-rings/tension/14k-white-gold-pave-bypass-bezel-set-diamond-engagement-ring-item-9225
or
http://www.jamesallen.com/engagement-rings/solitaire/18k-white-gold-regal-halo-engagement-ring-item-22555
The Jared setting is $1999. In total the ring will cost me $9600-$9700 with tax included.
I agree with what you said in that the diamond looks greasy/cloudy which is why I am taking it to an appraiser/gemologist to get their opinion on it. I think that the pictures do not do justice for the ring. I don't think that the diamond looks cloudy in real life either (although I never compared it next to a VS1 either). Being that the cert says "additional clouds not shown" makes me raise my eye brows. There is hardly any markings on the diamond and it is graded as an SI1, which is a concern I think.
Coralfish|1440432569|3918546 said:Hi busines4u
My gut feeling is that you should scrap this and start over. I think you can do a lot better and the looming deadline is not helping your thought process. I say this from experience. The diamond is not a bargain and neither is the setting.
By no means trust them re. being a couple of days over your return date!
It sounds like they are not giving you a discount on the setting in return for buying a diamond from them. I can see no reason to be tied to this diamond.
Ps I edited my post just above yours to show a variety of twisted prong settings. Please go back and have a look. I can look at other manufacturers too. If you feel able, perhaps show them to your intended and see whether she even prefers any to the jared setting. They are almost all cheaper than it, and almost all nicer, of course in my opinion, but just in terms of the fluidity and wearability of the design.
Even if she wants the Jared setting, I would still start again with the diamond. What was your general feeling about the stone options at James Allen?
In any case, what is your gut feeling about what to do re. the stone in hand.
Edited again to say:
If for any reason you really are set on this combination, insist on returning it today and rebuying it, to begin your ?30 day return period again. After all, you have not had the 30 (or 60, I don't know, sorry) full evaluation period with this particular stone.
Texas Leaguer|1440433159|3918549 said:Normally this comment alone does not raise red flags for transparency issues. But since cloud is listed first under keys to symbols, it is also a grade setting feature. It may not be a problem, but with the combination of the way the cert reads with some of the photos you have posted, you definitely want a specific opinion on the transparency aspect from a qualified, independent appraiser.busines4u|1440429905|3918521 said:Coralfish|1440429310|3918508 said:Hi,
As you are not yet tied into the diamond I feel it is okay to mention that in every picture it has a greasy/cloudy look. Is the diamond clean? I am still worried about 'clouds not shown'.
Please have them ultrasonic the diamond, then take it outside/inside next to a GIA/AGS VS1 or higher.
Then and only then a slight cloudiness may show up. It is not always obvious without a comparable to a layperson's eye.
How much is the Jared setting?
With a 9.5k budget and limited time I would buy this
http://www.jamesallen.com/loose-diamonds/round-cut/1.36-carat-h-color-vs2-clarity-ideal-cut-sku-584228
get it discounted to 9k with the advantage discount (just ask in chat or on the phone), and set it with something like this. You can ask them if they'll change the bezel to a claw prong.
http://www.jamesallen.com/engagement-rings/tension/14k-white-gold-pave-bypass-bezel-set-diamond-engagement-ring-item-9225
or
http://www.jamesallen.com/engagement-rings/solitaire/18k-white-gold-regal-halo-engagement-ring-item-22555
The Jared setting is $1999. In total the ring will cost me $9600-$9700 with tax included.
I agree with what you said in that the diamond looks greasy/cloudy which is why I am taking it to an appraiser/gemologist to get their opinion on it. I think that the pictures do not do justice for the ring. I don't think that the diamond looks cloudy in real life either (although I never compared it next to a VS1 either). Being that the cert says "additional clouds not shown" makes me raise my eye brows. There is hardly any markings on the diamond and it is graded as an SI1, which is a concern I think.