Where is the "very pregnant" picture of Bristol? The one where she''s wearing the animal print or the blue shirt? Please; that''s a girl with a belly. Most women have that. Go to any high school and you''ll see girls wearing clothing like that, too, with a belly. Very few women have iron flat bellies.
Trash talking blogs are not ethical journalism. You might as well be quoting the National Enquirer. Well, maybe since they broke the John Edwards story, that's not a good example. Okay, The Star or In Touch or The Daily Mail, etc.
As I have stated that I don’t like Sarah Palin. I think all this rummaging for mud on her is horrible.
1) If it is her daughters and not hers so what!! At least he was not aborted to keep the family name pristine.
2) At 16 most girls still have a certain amount of fat on them (and people wonder why anorexia & bulimia are on the rise just ridicule poor girls more stupid press). Nice to sully the mom’s reputation why don’t we make the young girl feel bad about her self image.
3) This is 2008 not 1912 when out of wed lock teens where disowned by there family and kicked out. Why would Sarah Palin go to so much effort to hide something that is sadly more of a common incidence?
4)She just looks stupid by not going to the local hospital if she was in labor, hey maybe she wanted to have him close to where her family could see the birth.
I wish news sources would just post about the bad gov skills and not bring in family stuff that has no barring on the race. Let’s not sully her family and just talk about her government abilities.
That pretty much sums up my whole way of thinking. ''Voting records'' don''t tell the tale of what a candidate can/will/should/might accomplish in the hot seat. It only records ''compromise'' for the sake of either expediency or being choosy in one''s battles. It''s not an indicator of character in a candidate.
I think it humanizes her image and is something many Americans can relate to. I don't think her daughter's love life should be at the forefront of any articles written about her because it doesn't really add to or take away from Palin's qualifications. I've never seen so much attention paid to an unelected candidate's children. It's quite sad and I agree that it shows that the Dems are nervous. I would rather Palin and McCain be the targets, as they are the actual candidates, and even then more so McCain. All of this focus on Palin may backfire, however, as less criticism is being aimed at McCain lately.
I am unfamiliar with McCain's comments (maybe you could fill me in). I don't doubt that it may have well happened, but I don't like the attitude of "an eye for an eye" in reference to candidate's children. They did not choose to be placed in the spotlight and I think they should ALL be left alone.
300x240.png)
