iluvcarats
Ideal_Rock
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2008
- Messages
- 2,892
Date: 9/1/2008 5:01:11 PM
Author: Macie
forget it
iluvcarats my post was not intended for you.
No worries Macie.
I wasn''t "drama queening", I just meant leaving the thread.
Date: 9/1/2008 5:01:11 PM
Author: Macie
forget it
iluvcarats my post was not intended for you.
I definitely understand your points as well.Date: 9/1/2008 4:52:52 PM
Author: Beacon
Indy, I tend to agree with you in general. But obviously the father has been in charge and things are not going all that well. Her family has now some serious issues beyond normal childcare and I think it may require a two parent attention level.
I do think about family issues for both male and female candidates. Principally b/c if the person cannot manage their personal issues very well, I have doubts about their ability to manage a whole country very well. I am not saying that the Palin''s have done a poor job with their family, but coincidence has brought some serious issues that need attention, IMO.
I agree with you, but i think both parties play into their religion/faith for more votes. Maybe religion/faith shouldn''t play a part in a political election, but the reality is that it does and candidates are all too happy to state their relifious affiliations, declare their belief in God, etc., etc. It''s too bad that you would leave the thread over this, but with the way things are going lately (people attacking, reading more into people''s posts than the actual words, etc.) it won''t be around for long anyway.Date: 9/1/2008 4:50:56 PM
Author: iluvcarats
Since so much of the Republican platform *is* faith based, I don''t see how you can talk about the issues without bringing it up, so I am not going to post here anymore. Sorry for bringing it up.
Date: 9/1/2008 5:37:33 PM
Author: IndyGirl22
I agree with you, but i think both parties play into their religion/faith for more votes. Maybe religion/faith shouldn''t play a part in a political election, but the reality is that it does and candidates are all too happy to state their relifious affiliations, declare their belief in God, etc., etc. It''s too bad that you would leave the thread over this, but with the way things are going lately (people attacking, reading more into people''s posts than the actual words, etc.) it won''t be around for long anyway.Date: 9/1/2008 4:50:56 PM
Author: iluvcarats
Since so much of the Republican platform *is* faith based, I don''t see how you can talk about the issues without bringing it up, so I am not going to post here anymore. Sorry for bringing it up.![]()
I will say that I find it very hard to believe that Mr. McCain chose Ms. Palin knowing about her daughter's pregnancy, however! One reads that he was aware of it, but not when he became aware of it. Who in his right mind would have picked Ms. Palin if he knew about this in advance? It is causing a firestorm and Mr. McCain needs the conservative Christian vote; it is why he decided not to ask Joseph Lieberman, his first choice in a running mate, to run with him! The only reason he rejected Mr. Lieberman is because the Christian right did not find the (very conservative) Mr. Lieberman conservative enough!
I think one would have to be very gullible indeed to think that Mr. McCain deliberately chose to bring this mess down upon himself! Either he is being disingenuous or he is dangerously out of touch!
Maybe I just see things differently, but what I feel will speak volumes to the conservative Christian voting populace is the fact that Bristol is keeping her baby. Teen pregnancy can happen to any family - even conservative Christians, and politicians. I don''t see the situation being a problem at all.Date: 9/1/2008 6:55:12 PM
Author: AGBF
Wow! I left the computer to travel for a few hours and in that time this thread became a hot potato! As I hope my earlier comments have made clear, I am not about to jump all over this poor teenager. I have one of my own, thank you, and I need all the support I can get for her!
I will say that I find it very hard to believe that Mr. McCain chose Ms. Palin knowing about her daughter''s pregnancy, however! One reads that he was aware of it, but not when he became aware of it. Who in his right mind would have picked Ms. Palin if he knew about this in advance? It is causing a firestorm and Mr. McCain needs the conservative Christian vote; it is why he decided not to ask Joseph Lieberman, his first choice in a running mate, to run with him! The only reason he rejected Mr. Lieberman is because the Christian right did not find the (very conservative) Mr. Lieberman conservative enough!
I think one would have to be very gullible indeed to think that Mr. McCain deliberately chose to bring this mess down upon himself! Either he is being disingenuous or he is dangerously out of touch!
Deborah
![]()
Hey Macie - I just reread this post and just in case you misunderstood the *ETA* I have in the body of the above post, it had originally read: "you asked a question..." I mistakenly put "you" instead of the poster, so the "(not you Macie)" part was just a clarification of that. I didn''t want this to come across as though I didn''t think you should''ve have replied to my post because it was only directed to anyone in particular. Just FYI.Date: 9/1/2008 4:43:15 PM
Author: IndyGirl22
Actually, *I* didn''t bring faith into the debate...*ETA* the POSTER (not you Macie) asked a question about ''religious'' Republicans and I answered it accordingly. I also didn''t say anything ''condemning'' about Biden or any Catholic who chooses to be pro-choice. I stated three undisputable facts: 1) Biden proclaims himself to be Catholic and uses it to get votes 2) He is pro-choice and 3) Abortion is against the Catholic religion. I did state that *I personally* found the inconsistency unfavorable, but don''t see where I condemned anyone and if you felt like I was speaking of you or other pro-choice Catholics then I am sorry.
ETA: If you were talking only to the original poster then disregard this post, but you quoted my response so I answered.
Date: 9/1/2008 7:12:05 PM
Author: LAJennifer
Maybe I just see things differently, but ... Teen pregnancy can happen to any family
... I don''t see the situation being a problem at all.
Date: 9/1/2008 7:29:53 PM
Author: AGBF
Date: 9/1/2008 7:12:05 PM
Author: LAJennifer
Maybe I just see things differently, but ... Teen pregnancy can happen to any family
... I don''t see the situation being a problem at all.
You don''t see the situation differently from me! I am very much on your wave length and believe that it can happen to most anyone. That is why I believe in teaching adolescents about birth control. Ms. Palin, however, advocates sexual abstinence! Her stand on this social issue was central to why Mr. McCain chose her!
Deborah
![]()
I see what you're saying but at this point in time, after abstinence and/or birth control (we don't know if it was used or not) have failed, what else would someone say about the situation? The best part about sins is that they can be forgiven (not trying to make this into a religion violation of PS, just speculating as to why I don't think conservatives/Republicans will have a problem with Palin's daughter's pregnancy).Date: 9/1/2008 7:33:29 PM
Author: thing2of2
Such an interesting situation! I love seeing how Republicans and evangelicals are responding to the news about Palin's daughter being preggo. I think the party line is 'At least she's keeping the baby!' Come on...the vast majority of Christian religions teach that it is a sin to have premarital sex. But now all that matters is she's not getting an abortion? Hilarious.
Date: 9/1/2008 7:40:59 PM
Author: IndyGirl22
Date: 9/1/2008 7:33:29 PM
Author: thing2of2
Such an interesting situation! I love seeing how Republicans and evangelicals are responding to the news about Palin''s daughter being preggo. I think the party line is ''At least she''s keeping the baby!'' Come on...the vast majority of Christian religions teach that it is a sin to have premarital sex. But now all that matters is she''s not getting an abortion? Hilarious.
I see what you''re saying but at this point in time, after abstinence and/or birth control (we don''t know if it was used or not) have failed, what else would someone say about the situation? The best part about sins is that they can be forgiven (not trying to make this into a religion violation of PS, just speculating as to why I don''t think conservatives/Republicans will have a problem with Palin''s daughter''s pregnancy).An abortion would''ve just added to the ''sin'' so I don''t see a different way to react to the news than to get over the premarital sex part and move onto the keeping it/adoption/abortion decision.![]()
Date: 9/1/2008 8:06:14 PM
Author: luckystar112
Well if you asked me I''d say that religious beliefs aside, abstinence is a pretty scientific way of preventing conception.![]()
Just like you can''t stop teens from having sex by teaching them about abstinence, you can''t be sure that a teen will use protection just by teaching them about it. So while both methods work in preventing pregnancy, it is ultimately up to the teenager and his/her own personal decision.
My argument isn''t against teaching birth control or for teaching abstinence, it''s about none of that mattering if the teenager opts not to follow the advise...which happens in both areas of sexual education.
ETA: That wink isn''t supposed to be snarky, t2o2. My point with it was that I don''t think abstinence is strictly a religious mentality. NOT teaching about BC can be though...although it can also be about not wanting a school to be that involved in your child''s life. I mean ultimately you have to do what Obama said, and teach your child morals--but even THAT isn''t a guarantee that it won''t happen to your child.
Wow. Stay classy, Fox News!Date: 9/1/2008 8:11:36 PM
Author: swimmer
What I do see as hypocrisy, and its awesome that FOX is urging everyone to stay away from Gov Palin''s daughter, I remember watching their morning show where they had people call in to identify what farm animals Chelsea Clinton looked like when BC was running his second campaign and she was about two years older than Bristol.
Date: 9/1/2008 8:31:23 PM
Author: luckystar112
I am confused about Palin and am looking forward to learning more.
It appears that she backs abstinence-only education....which may or may not be religiously based...
But then she has no problem with creationism AND evolution being taught in schools, as long as they are both taught and not one over the other.
So which is it? That makes it kind of hard to think that the abstinence-only issue is strictly fueled by relgion.
Haha swimmer I wondered how you felt about the turn this thread has taken! I have contributed to it, but I think most PSers have been thoughtful and contributed very nicely to the discussions, although they have been more about Palin''s daughter than Palin herself lately (I am guilty of helping it, too!). I would venture to say that Palin felt compelled to reveal her daughter''s pregnancy partly to dispel the rumors about her son being her grandson (!) and partly because she didn''t want people to find out and accuse her of "covering it up" once again. With all the attention paid to her daughter lately it would only be a matter of time before TMZ and the bloggers were reporting about it...quite sad, really. In any case, I''m sure she asked her daughter her thoughts before revealing the information.Date: 9/1/2008 8:11:36 PM
Author: swimmer
Hoping to move this discussion away from personal icky stuff...when I first created this thread I thought it would be a discussion about women voting for women.
My question about this situation, is why Gov Palin revealed her daughter''s condition, was it to dispel blogger''s rumors about her youngest not being her own? I can''t imagine violating my daughter''s privacy in order to make myself look better. Yes, the bloggers were out of line, what ever happened to ignoring when mud is thrown.
What I do see as hypocrisy, and its awesome that FOX is urging everyone to stay away from Gov Palin''s daughter, I remember watching their morning show where they had people call in to identify what farm animals Chelsea Clinton looked like when BC was running his second campaign and she was about two years older than Bristol.
That's a whole different topic, really, but there are two types of evolution: Micro and Macro. Both are theories, but one makes sense and has logic and evidence to support it, while the other, well, that's more debateable.Date: 9/1/2008 8:39:14 PM
Author: thing2of2
Date: 9/1/2008 8:31:23 PM
Author: luckystar112
I am confused about Palin and am looking forward to learning more.
It appears that she backs abstinence-only education....which may or may not be religiously based...
But then she has no problem with creationism AND evolution being taught in schools, as long as they are both taught and not one over the other.
So which is it? That makes it kind of hard to think that the abstinence-only issue is strictly fueled by relgion.
The abstinence-only issue is likely fueled by religion and pandering to the religious right. I've never heard an argument for abstinence-only education based on anything but religion.
And as for creationism being taught alongside evolution, doesn't she have to say she's okay with evolution being taught since it's, you know, real?
That link states their goal is linked to the vote they were entitled to in 1958; and then lists 4 things they were entitled to vote for in that year. It doesn''t say they want to break free and be their own nation.Date: 9/1/2008 9:50:18 PM
Author: purrfectpear
Palin=Train Wreck
More to come.
Considering she claims she wanted to ''protect'' the boy''s privacy, she did call him out as Levi. It took me all of 10 minutes on Google to discover EXACTLY who he was. Seriously, she knew what she was doing. Her picture is on a myspace of Levi''s sister holding Trig, referring to her as mommyinlaw (now set to private). So much for privacy.
Palin was a member of the Alaska Independence Party. Re: the AIP – their own website homepage states that their ''Ultimate Goal'' includes ''Become a separate and Independent Nation.'' If that''s not secessionist...
http://www.akip.org/
Don''t know what McCain was thinking, but you''re supposed to vett candidates BEFORE you announce them.![]()
It almost makes you feel sorry for him![]()
Date: 9/2/2008 12:19:17 AM
Author: tanuki
This just in . . . . (from slate.com)
SARAH PALIN''s ''TO DO'' List -
for Tuesday September 2, 2008
1. Learn about Al Qaeda.
2. Learn about Washington D.C.
3. Order Bristol''s dress (Elastic waist!!! Is white inappropriate after 6 mos?)
4. Fire brother-in-law.
5. Learn about Russia/Georgia/S.Ossetia (Locate Abkhazia???)
6 Nurse Baby Trig.
7. Order flowers for wedding.
8. Fire people who haven''t fired brother-in-law
9. Learn about ethics rules.
10. Fire at brother-in-law? (option: aerial shooting?)
11. Nurse Baby Trig.
12. Learn about Iran.
13. Learn about U.S. Senate.
14. Learn about contraception. (Too late???)
15. Investigate homes for foundlings?
16. Govern Alaska.
17. Life insurance on J.M.?