First off, I want to thank everyone on these boards. A lot of my research has started with the great advice that has been provided in this forum. Hoping everyone can keep it going with my turn.
After plugging away online and locally, I have found two local shops that have provided me with some great options.
My setting is between a Pave setting (from Shop A) and a Channel setting (From Shop B). I have considered getting the setting from one and diamond from another if it comes down to it.
Diamond Details
Shop A offers
Shape: Round Brilliant GIA Cert
Carat: 1.21ct
Color: E
Cut: Excellent
Clarity: SI1
Polish: Excellent
Symmetry: Excellent
Measurements: 6.77 x 6.81 x 4.24mm
Table: 57%
Depth: 62.5%
Fluor: Strong Blue (yikes)
Medium to slightly thick - Faceted
In-person and on the Pave setting, looked like this:
Thoughts: Looked great in-person. The inclusions and blemishes were not really as notable to the eye (saw them under an eye-loop) but since the majority are toward the edge, it was better than I thought. Biggest concern is really the fluorescence. Saw it against a white surface and didn't have much effect in the store. I'm wondering if I see it again, what else can I do to make sure I'm seeing what I need to see.
Shop B Offers
#1
Shape: Round Brilliant GIA Cert
Carat: 1.22ct
Color: G
Cut: Excellent
Clarity: SI1
Polish: Excellent
Symmetry: Excellent
Measurements: 6.85 x 6.88 x 4.24mm
Table: 57%
Depth: 61.8%
Fluor: None
Medium to slightly thick - Faceted
#2
Shape: Round Brilliant GIA Cert
Carat: 1.22ct
Color: G
Cut: Very Good
Clarity: VS2
Polish: Good
Symmetry: Very Good
Measurements: 6.89 x 6.94 x 4.21mm
Table: 57%
Depth: 60.9%
Fluor: None
Thin to slightly thick - Faceted
*reached my image limit but have the diagram of inclusions for this one as well (very few in the center, medium cloud towards the edge)*
In-person and on the Channel Setting:
Thoughts: #1's inclusions were visible to the eye and under the loop since it was dead center. Not large but wondering if it's worth saving the money from the jump in clarity to #2. #2, even though cut, polish and sym were not excellent, I was impressed by the table/depth numbers and other grades it received and as you can see from the image, it is quite beautiful.
AND FINALLY
If you have made it this far down, thank you. While I take a breath, my questions are:
1) Is it worth going to see the E again in-person and ask to look at it under different lights?
2) Should the fact that I can see the inclusion in the #1 from Shop B deter me from purchasing it considering the Triple Ex grades it received (and no fluor) or should I just save the extra money to bump to #2's clarity to ease my mind (even though the grades don't match up as well)?
THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU IN ADVANCE for any suggestions to help me base my decision on.




After plugging away online and locally, I have found two local shops that have provided me with some great options.
My setting is between a Pave setting (from Shop A) and a Channel setting (From Shop B). I have considered getting the setting from one and diamond from another if it comes down to it.
Diamond Details
Shop A offers
Shape: Round Brilliant GIA Cert
Carat: 1.21ct
Color: E
Cut: Excellent
Clarity: SI1
Polish: Excellent
Symmetry: Excellent
Measurements: 6.77 x 6.81 x 4.24mm
Table: 57%
Depth: 62.5%
Fluor: Strong Blue (yikes)
Medium to slightly thick - Faceted
In-person and on the Pave setting, looked like this:
Thoughts: Looked great in-person. The inclusions and blemishes were not really as notable to the eye (saw them under an eye-loop) but since the majority are toward the edge, it was better than I thought. Biggest concern is really the fluorescence. Saw it against a white surface and didn't have much effect in the store. I'm wondering if I see it again, what else can I do to make sure I'm seeing what I need to see.
Shop B Offers
#1
Shape: Round Brilliant GIA Cert
Carat: 1.22ct
Color: G
Cut: Excellent
Clarity: SI1
Polish: Excellent
Symmetry: Excellent
Measurements: 6.85 x 6.88 x 4.24mm
Table: 57%
Depth: 61.8%
Fluor: None
Medium to slightly thick - Faceted
#2
Shape: Round Brilliant GIA Cert
Carat: 1.22ct
Color: G
Cut: Very Good
Clarity: VS2
Polish: Good
Symmetry: Very Good
Measurements: 6.89 x 6.94 x 4.21mm
Table: 57%
Depth: 60.9%
Fluor: None
Thin to slightly thick - Faceted
*reached my image limit but have the diagram of inclusions for this one as well (very few in the center, medium cloud towards the edge)*
In-person and on the Channel Setting:
Thoughts: #1's inclusions were visible to the eye and under the loop since it was dead center. Not large but wondering if it's worth saving the money from the jump in clarity to #2. #2, even though cut, polish and sym were not excellent, I was impressed by the table/depth numbers and other grades it received and as you can see from the image, it is quite beautiful.
AND FINALLY
If you have made it this far down, thank you. While I take a breath, my questions are:
1) Is it worth going to see the E again in-person and ask to look at it under different lights?
2) Should the fact that I can see the inclusion in the #1 from Shop B deter me from purchasing it considering the Triple Ex grades it received (and no fluor) or should I just save the extra money to bump to #2's clarity to ease my mind (even though the grades don't match up as well)?
THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU IN ADVANCE for any suggestions to help me base my decision on.



