Critique the Ideal Scope and Aset please....

[ryebread]

#1

 

[ryebread]

#2

 

[dmus]

They look like very strong performers. The idealscope shows maybe just a bit more leakage on perimeter than what may be ideal. That''s probably being just a bit too picky. If these were stones I was considering I wouldn''t hesitate in the least.

 

[ryebread]

I appreciate your honesty!

 

[Lorelei]

Date: 3/14/2008 4:22:04 PM
Author: dmus
They look like very strong performers. The idealscope shows maybe just a bit more leakage on perimeter than what may be ideal. That's probably being just a bit too picky. If these were stones I was considering I wouldn't hesitate in the least.

The IS is excellent as is the ASET, typical of the ACA brand. See this thread regarding the white areas on the Idealscope image, as this will explain - see John Quixote's post.

https://www.pricescope.com/community/threads/aca-stone-new-line-or-classic.36907/

 

[kcoursolle]

Date: 3/14/2008 4:22:04 PM
Author: dmus
They look like very strong performers. The idealscope shows maybe just a bit more leakage on perimeter than what may be ideal. That''s probably being just a bit too picky. If these were stones I was considering I wouldn''t hesitate in the least.

The ideal scope image is excellent. The girdle area shows the look of WF''s "classic" line of ACA''s rather than their painted stones which have red all the way through the perimeter. I have a few stones that have a similar IS image and I personally like the look of the classic line, some argue the lack of painting adds contrast.