Thanks for that #2 is about US$700 more but the online jeweller by looking at those pics was telling me that #1 is better because it has better arrows and hearts#2 just going by the specs
Pics?Thanks for that #2 is about US$700 more but the online jeweller by looking at those pics was telling me that #1 is better because it has better arrows and hearts![]()
Pics = Photos. They only gave me 1 photo per stone .Pics?
Do not work with this vendor.[QUOTE="flyingpig, post:
I was thinking how do some other diamonds online look better with inferior specs. Do you think they have just sent me any photo to shut me up. They keep saying they don't have any more photos and that the diamonds are in new York and myself and the online store are in Australia. What do you think?
Unfortunately, yesDo you think they have just sent me any photo to shut me up.
Find yourself another vendor.Pics = Photos. They only gave me 1 photo per stone .
Do not work with this vendor.
How the heck this vendor is able to tell you #1 is better because it has better hearts, based on these photos alone?
Second, did you take the photos of the GIA reports? or are they from the vendor as well? If the reports are provided by the vendor, it really is a extremely poor way to present products and reports to the customer.
Third, with more digging, I was able to find #2 from bluenile.
https://www.bluenile.com/diamond-details/LD06645818?click_id=722035663
How the heck this vendor is unable to provide more photos when I can find?
Unfortunately, yes