shape
carat
color
clarity

Before sending this to GIA... two questions

Choose all that apply

  • Edwina Cutwater

    Votes: 2 10.0%
  • Lilliana Sparklepants

    Votes: 4 20.0%
  • Pinky Tuscadero

    Votes: 6 30.0%
  • Other

    Votes: 1 5.0%
  • Don’t engrave the report number

    Votes: 6 30.0%
  • Don’t name the stone

    Votes: 4 20.0%

  • Total voters
    20
  • Poll closed .

PreRaphaelite

Ideal_Rock
Joined
Feb 2, 2015
Messages
3,564
So here’s the pawn shop splurge from a previous post, separated from the little baby (being set in platinum milgrain bezel). She’s clean as a whistle. I’m sending her to GIA today. No matter what her grade is when she comes back from the lab, I really want to keep her. Seems like with her longer pavilion facets she’s likely to be a transitional but we’ll see what they say. Meanwhile, I have two questions for you all...

First, is there any reason to NOT have the report number laser inscribed on the sugar frosted girdle?

And second, what should I name her?
9AF64131-79BB-4437-9ACA-BB67D32310D2.jpeg 079F0E47-9EBF-4B17-83A7-4833B22B2E5F.jpeg037C8AD4-F60E-4CBB-B391-082D1AE3DB78.jpeg896E7BE4-70CF-4336-8D64-D960E17714BB.jpeg

Edited to add, sorry for the dust!
 

Attachments

  • 5DF7A7FA-5549-451A-A80E-764312FFB6C3.jpeg
    5DF7A7FA-5549-451A-A80E-764312FFB6C3.jpeg
    106.8 KB · Views: 13
hmmm, not sure about the laser inscribing. Shes SO beautiful, what about Rosie?
 
Name....not sure.
I will add that sometimes a laser inscription can cause a reflection that might look like a tiny imperfection.
This would only be visible if one has incredibly sharp vision.
So if that aspect might bother you, I'd skip it......
 
I am with @Rockdiamond If having it laser inscribed would cause a reflection that looks like a tiny imperfection I would say don't do it.
As for the name Pinky Tuscadero of course. Pretty stone!

pinkytuscadero.jpg
 
Thanks for responding. I asked for the full monty in my service request, but they won’t do the engraving until they hear from me so I still have time to decide. Therefore if anyone else wants to weigh in, please do.

Speaking of weight, my scale said it was 1.0 ct even... and at 6mm, that tells me the scale was either calibrated wrong (possible) or it’s a chubby chubster. Either way, no cheesecake for a while.
 
I wouldn’t inscribe esp it if is not a modern round brilliant. The just didn’t have that then. and the frosted girdle might impede inscribing. Don’t know though. Just seems weird.

What a cutie. I like pinkie T too :)
 
So I sent it off, registered and insured... and the tracking number is a reused one, and I’m fretting about it. The postal clerk asked me what the contents were, and I responded “samples” because I couldn’t think of what else to say. Now I’m sitting here stewing until the tracking number starts working.

Argh.
 
Sparklepants did it for :lol-2:
 
Did you take more detailed macro pics to map its inclusion than what the pics show, just in case...?
 
I was unsure about inscribing my Oec as well. Ultimately I didn’t because I felt;

- someone trying to dupe me could easily polish the inscription off
- if the inscription was polished off the stone would have to be identified by the inclusion plot the same way as if the inscription never happened
- I felt I wanted to preserve the original condition
- I wasn’t 100% sure what was the right thing to do so I didn’t
- any jeweller with the equipment can do the inscription if I decide I want it later

The advice I received was very supportive both ways and I did what I felt comfortable with.
 
Did you take more detailed macro pics to map its inclusion than what the pics show, just in case...?
I didn’t take macro shots, no. The stone has a distinctive tiny cavity (visible at 10 o’clock) so I’ll be able to recognize my stone as long as it is unset. Once set, the cavity might be covered by a prong. But I do take your point, honest.
 
I was unsure about inscribing my Oec as well. Ultimately I didn’t because I felt;

- someone trying to dupe me could easily polish the inscription off
- if the inscription was polished off the stone would have to be identified by the inclusion plot the same way as if the inscription never happened
- I felt I wanted to preserve the original condition
- I wasn’t 100% sure what was the right thing to do so I didn’t
- any jeweller with the equipment can do the inscription if I decide I want it later

The advice I received was very supportive both ways and I did what I felt comfortable with.

That’s a good argument. I probably should not have the number lasered on. Thank you for this. When they contact me to confirm and take payment, I’ll decline the inscription.

Thanks.
 
I just wanted to update this thread thanking everyone for commenting. I decided not to have the report number engraved and I’m grateful for all the replies. Thanks!
 
  • Like
Reactions: AV_
Do you have her back from GIA?

Did you name her yet? To me she looks like an old faded photo of a sunset. So much personality!

Wink
 
Thanks Wink! She's got color, that's for sure! Her report says she's a 1.01 VS2 "L" and I'm more than happy with that. No name as of yet. I'm sure it will come to me as I drift to sleep tonight.

zzzz - my unicorn - zzzz

They'll ship it Monday via fedex overnight. Tuesday is going to be a wonderful day for me and I'll be waking on air for quite a while afterward. :geek2: :love: :dance:
 
  • Like
Reactions: AV_
Llllllllovely pawn shop find!! Wowza!
 
Thanks Ringo!
 
Too lat.e to vote but Pinky Tuscadero is perfect!
 
GET 3 FREE HCA RESULTS JOIN THE FORUM. ASK FOR HELP
Top