2.00 ct F/SI1 Cushion - Is this a good stone?!? (SEE PICS) !

[marygrace]

Re: 2.00 ct F/SI1 Cushion - Is this a good stone?!? (SEE PIC

any opinions about the double prong on the face? me being the perfectionist I am, noticed that all four corners double prongs are not exactly the same size...

how hard for it is them to reset and shave the prongs down so they all are the smaller size and not the bigger size?

Nice ring!

It shouldn't be too hard to polish the prongs down so that they are even. I doubt that the stone would need to be taken out.

 

[CushionRock2012]

Re: 2.00 ct F/SI1 Cushion - Is this a good stone?!? (SEE PIC

thanks, good to know that they might not have to even take the stone out....


another question I have on something I just realized on the AGS report.... the girdle goes all the way up to 6% of the depth of the center stone at the highest point! while the EGL report just said the girdle was "thin"

isn't 6% obscenely high for a maximum girdle depth percentage (see cert I posted for reference)?

stone is set and ring looks AWESOME and I am just planning the proposal now....however, I just saw this 6% number and was like WTF?

 

[CushionRock2012]

Re: 2.00 ct F/SI1 Cushion - Is this a good stone?!? (SEE PIC

thanks, good to know that they might not have to even take the stone out....


another question I have on something I just realized on the AGS report.... the girdle goes all the way up to 6% of the depth of the center stone at the highest point! while the EGL report just said the girdle was "thin"

isn't 6% obscenely high for a maximum girdle depth percentage (see cert I posted for reference)?

stone is set and ring looks AWESOME and I am just planning the proposal now....however, I just saw this 6% number and was like WTF?

nervermind... found the answer on google... just another interesting variance in girdle between AGS and EGL