Kaleigh
Super_Ideal_Rock
- Joined
- Nov 18, 2004
- Messages
- 29,571
Date: 6/28/2006 11:27:20 PM
Author: mrssalvo
well, I think something like kaleigh''s ring would be perfect. It''s got a antique feel and would give the added umph you''re wanting. I know your mom has a halo but rounds in a halo look completely different to me than asschers in a halo. I think you should get what you want. does it really matter that much what your mom has? she lives on the other side of the country right? so it''s not like you''d be running in the same social circles where anyone would really notice? I''d get what I wanted and not care at all if my mom had it already. Did you ever read any old threads of Reena''s? she has a cushion halo made by Leon, I''m sure you''ve seen it. Well last year her mom joined PS to share she was having Leon make her a new setting doing a halo with her round. We never saw the finished product but no doubt it turned out beautifully. are their rings similar? sure and they even have the same artist who made them but they don''t look alike. I don''t think a leon ring for you would look anything like your mom''s
if I must choose from your current list I''d go with the bag. halo from quest just to get the added visual size impact. I like the landi but not loving setting it like a baseball diamond, plus I think those split shank/crowns won''t make your stone look any bigger, possibly smaller b/c it gives the illusion of a wider band if that makes sense.
Date: 6/28/2006 11:46:23 PM
Author: Kaleigh
Hey Gypsy,
If it makes you feel any better, I think I had 4 threads for my asscher project start to finish. I loved getting everyone''s advice and I don''t recall anyone minding too much. Or maybe they were polite and didn''t tell me they minded. We love a work in progress!!!
Nah... honesty is MUCH preferred.Date: 6/29/2006 12:01:01 AM
Author: Mara
HAHA well PS''ers are pretty polite. Just not everyone.Gyp, that is what I love about you though...you don''t get feathers ruffled by a little honesty!!
As for loony...well that''s all of us!!!
Date: 6/29/2006 12:09:33 AM
Author: KristyDarling
#1!!!!! God I love how it looks like a big ole Art Deco mirror! I know it carries some risk, but Quest''s track record is pretty stellar and as long as they promise to be responsive to all your concerns/fix little boo-boos then it should be fine.
#2 is a cute idea but not so sure it''d be really wearable. (stabby corner prongs?) I''m also not a humongous fan of putting a gorgeous asscher offset 45 degrees like that. It confuses my eyes and I suffer convulsions.I think that look works a little better for princess cuts. Just my humble opinion.
Date: 6/29/2006 12:24:14 AM
Author: KristyDarling
WOOHOO!!!!My heart just skipped a beat. The wait for this baby is going to be EXCRUCIATING.
Date: 6/29/2006 1:37:33 AM
Author: wallermama
I vote for #1.
But...
I''m still sad that underlying all of this is the fact that you don''t really looooove your asscher/asscher size and might prefer a spreadier something else, because really I wish that you felt your FI would understand a desire to use the resetting fund for a new stone.
It seems like all of these posts are different attempts for you to be happier with something you truly aren''t happy with, since you really didn''t love asschers above all else (which is the only way most of us can get over the small spread of asschers...when you love them so much you''re willing to sacrifice), and I worry that no matter what the reset is, your DSS is so extreme and you have such can''t-shut-their-mouths friends (I''ll never forget you mentioning their snide remarks about size) that you''ll end up in the same boat and then you''ll have to face telling your new husband that you aren''t happy with 1) the first setting,2) the new setting, and 3) the stone itself. Talk about decreasing the odds that he''ll feel good about your ring...phew! Perhaps if you nipped this in the bud right now you could get the big sparkler of your dreams without all of the added steps, heartbreaks, and lost money.
It worries me that you only want setting #1 because of it making the stone look larger, when you said something about it not really being your usual style. A large cash/effort outlay for a ring that may not be your style is a big risk.
Sorry if I blab too much, but you did ask for honesty!
Hmmm... I kinda like the one with the halo better because it''s so different and interesting! My only downer, and I know this is strictly my opinion, is that I, personally, prefer stones that don''t have halos that attempt to make the stone look larger. ::ducking:: yeah, I know... but if that''s what you''re going for, that first piece does a FANTASTIC job of it and looks very interesting and classy. Not as fond of the side stones, but definitely like that halo, as halos go.Date: 6/28/2006 9:13:26 PM
Author:Gypsy
This is a little premature as I don''t have the complete prices for these in yet... but thought I''d ask for your opinions anyway. Here is my current ring on my hand. Ring size is 6.
PLEASE, PLEASE don''t hold back your opinions... your HONEST opinions are welcome 100% and I won''t take offense to anything you say.
Here are the options: 1-- custom baguette halo. 2-- Richard Landi split shank with offset diamond. 3-- I''m driving you crazy and you just don''t care.
Here''s my blub about the baguette halo:
Plus side: It is unique and it makes my asscher look bigger, and I love the idea of a deco inspired setting for my asscher. Downside is: it''s custom so it''s not going to be perfect... especially since it''s a difficult and ''groundbreaking'' for Quest design. AND platinum is very expensive right now. And I''m afraid of not loving it because it''s not my ''usual'' style.
Here''s the pic: please ignore the band pictured.
Second is a Richard Landi setting I found at a local jeweler... he has it is stock so I would be paying last years platinum prices for it, getting the monster prongs slimmed down and adding pave to the prongs. My asscher would be set in it like a baseball diamond. Tim at GOG and Strm have both said that setting it this way will not be dangerous as my diamond is an asscher and has a thick girdle. It''s about the same width as my current setting in total.
Here''s my blurb:
Landi split shank will be unique with my asscher offset and it''s not custom... I looked at it under a loop and it''s flawless. With the designer doing the rest of the work to it... it''s likely going to be perfect when it''s done too and it''s priced at ''last years'' platinum prices so I feel like I''m getting a good deal. Downside is: Despite Tim and Storm''s assurances I''m nervous about setting my diamond like that-- and I don''t like it set ''normal'' in the setting. ETA: This setting won''t make my diamond look bigger and I''ve got DSS.
wow! on that size rock, that halo looks diminutive! I love it! Okay Gypsy, I like this one too! lolDate: 6/28/2006 10:47:44 PM
Author: Gypsy
Date: 6/28/2006 10:39:36 PM
Author: Kaleigh
Storm helped me pick it. He said what a great spread it had and when I got it from GOG I was really amazed. So adding a halo to it makes it look really big. Even though it''s a RHR no DSS has set in!!
Storm. I swear if I win the lottery I''m gonna bribe that man to pick out an asscher for me. What for? I don''t know... I just want a Storm picked asscher, darnit!
And I can TOTALLY see why DSS hasn''t kicked in yet. This baby is huge! I LOVE THAT! Without you having to run and get anything further (sorry I had no idea you''d have to run about for the numbers-- I''m crazy as I''ve got mine memorized) -- do you know about how thick your shank is? Just a guess is fine. I told quest I wanted 1.7-- but I''m doubting that now.
That just made me think of something... I''ll be going through San Francisco in a few weeks... I should stop by there and visit a nice jewlery store...Date: 6/28/2006 11:48:35 PM
Author: Gypsy
(You know if you all were going the Bay Area GTG one WEEK later I''d be able to swing by???)