Hi all,
I'm still pretty new here... still shopping for a nice diamond and I've studied up on the 4 C's and am a bit familiar with the various angles involved in cut evaluation. With that being said, I ran across this scenario and I can't figure it out.
Here are two stones from BGD, both are G VS2, AGS 000. One is 1.09ct and the other is 1.01 ct. Yet, the 1.01 ct is almost $2000 more than the 1.09 ct. The 1.01 ct lists for 11,300 while the 1.09 ct lists for 9,500. When I look at the various angles and specs, they are both very similar. My gut feeling is that 9,500 seems low for a G VS2 of that size.
I've seen this kind of thing before, and it's making me wonder if there is something about the 1.01 stone I am missing, that causes it to be 20% more than the 1.09 stone of very similar specs. Pricing error perhaps? Is there some glaring flaw with the 1.09 stone that I am just not seeing, or something spectacular about the 1.01 stone I am missing? Any insight or constructive help is much appreciated, as I seem to enjoy learning about these things more than shopping for them! Thanks in advance.
The 1.09 stone:
http://www.briangavindiamonds.com/diamond/diamond-detail/?product_id=AGS-104051364022
The 1.01 stone:
http://www.briangavindiamonds.com/diamond/diamond-detail/?product_id=AGS-104052883009
I'm still pretty new here... still shopping for a nice diamond and I've studied up on the 4 C's and am a bit familiar with the various angles involved in cut evaluation. With that being said, I ran across this scenario and I can't figure it out.
Here are two stones from BGD, both are G VS2, AGS 000. One is 1.09ct and the other is 1.01 ct. Yet, the 1.01 ct is almost $2000 more than the 1.09 ct. The 1.01 ct lists for 11,300 while the 1.09 ct lists for 9,500. When I look at the various angles and specs, they are both very similar. My gut feeling is that 9,500 seems low for a G VS2 of that size.
I've seen this kind of thing before, and it's making me wonder if there is something about the 1.01 stone I am missing, that causes it to be 20% more than the 1.09 stone of very similar specs. Pricing error perhaps? Is there some glaring flaw with the 1.09 stone that I am just not seeing, or something spectacular about the 1.01 stone I am missing? Any insight or constructive help is much appreciated, as I seem to enjoy learning about these things more than shopping for them! Thanks in advance.
The 1.09 stone:
http://www.briangavindiamonds.com/diamond/diamond-detail/?product_id=AGS-104051364022
The 1.01 stone:
http://www.briangavindiamonds.com/diamond/diamond-detail/?product_id=AGS-104052883009