which setting is prettier?

[swl]

I like them both a lot Which setting you think is prettier? please list out 3 words that come to your mind when you first see each ring

 

[swl]

the second setting

 

[btrflygrl23]

My vote is for the 1st setting. When I saw it I thought gorgeous, blingy, and lovely.

When I saw the 2nd one I thought interesting, sleek, and more simple and I mean in relation to the 1st setting.

Hope that helps

 

[tyty333]

The first one gets my vote...the second one seems like its a 3 stone want-to-be (you can shoot me now

).
The first one seems like a true 3 stone with some added bling!

If you are more into simplier settings though then maybe the second one would be a good choice.

 

[decodelighted]

I prefer #1 by a MILE.

#1 - classic, blingy, sparkly
#2 - cocktail, cluster, mall store

 

[AprilBaby]

No vote cause I like them both, but #1, blingy, trendy, busy; #2, elegant, simple, different...depends what you are looking for.

 

[wishinpink]

First one!!!

Sparkly, three stone, classic

 

[isaku5]

#1 by a mile for me too...blingy and tasteful with a dash of vintage.

 

[Mrs_Darcy]

I vote #1 too - much classier and more elegant in my opinion.

 

[tigian]

#1 is gorgeous, classy, and blingy!

 

[dreambrother]

My vote is for #1. Very "blingy" but very very nice.

#1: Ice, Elegant, Pretty

#2: Clean, Sparkly, Sharp

 

[Tuckins1]

I vote for #1!!! Stunning!

 

[Stone Hunter]

#1 Classic, three stone, timeless

#2 more modern, NOT a three stone, ok

I''d go for #1!

 

[dh97]

#1 for me.

 

[jstarfireb]

Honestly, I''m not really a fan of either. The first one is too much bling for me (I''m a solitaire kind of gal). I prefer the second, but I think it would be much better if the clusters were replaced by trillions, like this (got the link from a Google search):

http://www.bluenile.com/diamond-engagement-ring-setting-platinum_2963

I guess the word association for me would be:
1) Busy, overdone, heavy
2) Simple, clean, elegant

 

[VRBeauty]

Date: 6/1/2009 5:02:17 PM
Author: AprilBaby
No vote cause I like them both, but #1, blingy, trendy, busy; #2, elegant, simple, different...depends what you are looking for.

Ditto, except that I prefer #2 overall. I''d look for true 3-stone with lines like #2 lines, if that''s a possibility.....

 

[writergeek]

I vote for number two as well.

1. busy, stone overshadowed

2. cleaner, stone highlighted

Just my opinion from the pics...

 

[D&T]

Date: 6/2/2009 3:08:06 PM
Author: VRBeauty

Date: 6/1/2009 5:02:17 PM
Author: AprilBaby
No vote cause I like them both, but #1, blingy, trendy, busy; #2, elegant, simple, different...depends what you are looking for.

Ditto, except that I prefer #2 overall. I''d look for true 3-stone with lines like #2 lines, if that''s a possibility.....

thritto

 

[motownmama]

I prefer clean lines, so b/t the two it would be the second for me. I like the idea of trillions.

 

[atroop711]

I''d vote for #1..I love when their are diamonds down the shank of the ring

 

[rickster123]

#1

1) I prefer bling
2) looks half complete

 

[DiamondFlame]

1) overwrought vintage bling

2) old school glam

If I had to pick btw the 2, I''ll go for no. 2.