- Apr 30, 2005
Here are settings I’m considering.
Which do you think would look best with a 2.26 asscher?
Rather, which would you eliminate?
Pricescope Upgrade/Maintenance Is Complete.
We still have a few things to iron out. If you see any bugs, issues or have any concerns, let us know here in this discussion.
that is way kewlDate: 12/12/2006 6:29:07 PM
I don''t know how difficult it is to set an asscher in tension on an angle (guess it''s not) and how far weird Kenny would go...
But i wanted a diamond set facing an owned rather then the sky for the long time. From another side a you can see a lot of pavilion, and i know Kenny wanted to be able to do so.
Anyway, here is my''Egoist'' setting.
darn it I missed three of them???? but yeah I am with you on the #2 stone.Date: 12/12/2006 5:56:16 PM
I deleted three of the 11.
Now there are only 8 possibilities.
Does anyone think the top-right one will look too much like a woman''s ring?
Keep in mind it will have a larger square stone.
The squared-back ones look odd to me, but when you wear it you won''t notice.
You make sense to me and I''m so glad you say this!! Since I''m having the mirrored thing done too There''s actually a lot of things I like about your ring as it is nowDate: 12/12/2006 6:14:07 PM
I''ll repeat my STRONG suggestion to at least check out what your asscher would look like in a setting with a mirrored trough under the stone (rather than your bare skin). I don''t know exactly why but on mine it''s trippy. Mine didn''t start out that way .. it was in prongs, but I had it set lower into the setting and WOW. Pictures don''t really capture it but right out of the pro cleaning: Kaliedescopic.
Settings like that - the stone still floats like your tension designs ... there''s just shiny metal underneath the stone against your finger.
Eh ... I''m a little under the weather so I''m not making sense!