Which of these would you pick?

[btrflygrl23]

Hi which one of these stones would be a better pick and which one would look bigger in general and face up bigger once set? I''m new so I can''t gauge anything like this so any help would be really appreciated! Thanks so much!

Number 1 H and SI1 (not sure if it is eye clean but can check and I think it is)

. Shape: A Cut Above Princess
. Carat: 2.071
. Depth %: 75.5
. Table %: 68.4
. Crown Angle: 43
. Crown %: 12.9
. Pavilion Angle: 40.2
. Pavilion %: 59.6
. Girdle: Thin to Medium
. Measurements: 6.88-6.83X5.16
. Light Performance: 0
. Polish: Ideal
. Symmetry: Ideal
. Culet: Pointed
. Fluorescence: Negligible

Number 2 H and VVS 2 ( I know this is a bit too high b/c it''s stuff I can''t see)

Shape: A Cut Above Princess
. Carat: 2.003
. Depth %: 74.8
. Table %: 72
. Crown Angle: 44.8
. Crown %: 12.7
. Pavilion Angle: 40.1
. Pavilion %: 59.4
. Girdle: Medium
. Measurements: 6.77-6.76X5.05
. Light Performance: 0
. Polish: Ideal
. Symmetry: Ideal
. Culet: Pointed
. Fluorescence: Negligible

The price diff b/w the 2 stones is not too large and my budget can handle either one.

 

[Gypsy]

The SI one is a little bigger... not sure if it''s a huge visual difference though, it''s almost 7 x 7.

I''m not a princess expert... or even a novice though I''m not sure any of the princess guru''s are on so I thought I''d take a shot at helping... both are AGS triple zeros... so I would just call WF and ask them which one is nicer to the eye...

Actually if you can link to the two stones... we can look at the IS and so forth... that would be a good way to help you.

 

[btrflygrl23]

Ok I will thanks Gypsy!!

 

[bosoxbw]

Both will likely be very nice (AGS000).

That being said, definitely #1.
No sense in paying for the VVS.