btrflygrl23
Brilliant_Rock
- Joined
- Jan 30, 2007
- Messages
- 816
Hi which one of these stones would be a better pick and which one would look bigger in general and face up bigger once set? I''m new so I can''t gauge anything like this so any help would be really appreciated! Thanks so much!
Number 1 H and SI1 (not sure if it is eye clean but can check and I think it is)
. Shape: A Cut Above Princess
. Carat: 2.071
. Depth %: 75.5
. Table %: 68.4
. Crown Angle: 43
. Crown %: 12.9
. Pavilion Angle: 40.2
. Pavilion %: 59.6
. Girdle: Thin to Medium
. Measurements: 6.88-6.83X5.16
. Light Performance: 0
. Polish: Ideal
. Symmetry: Ideal
. Culet: Pointed
. Fluorescence: Negligible
Number 2 H and VVS 2 ( I know this is a bit too high b/c it''s stuff I can''t see)
Shape: A Cut Above Princess
. Carat: 2.003
. Depth %: 74.8
. Table %: 72
. Crown Angle: 44.8
. Crown %: 12.7
. Pavilion Angle: 40.1
. Pavilion %: 59.4
. Girdle: Medium
. Measurements: 6.77-6.76X5.05
. Light Performance: 0
. Polish: Ideal
. Symmetry: Ideal
. Culet: Pointed
. Fluorescence: Negligible
The price diff b/w the 2 stones is not too large and my budget can handle either one.

Number 1 H and SI1 (not sure if it is eye clean but can check and I think it is)
. Shape: A Cut Above Princess
. Carat: 2.071
. Depth %: 75.5
. Table %: 68.4
. Crown Angle: 43
. Crown %: 12.9
. Pavilion Angle: 40.2
. Pavilion %: 59.6
. Girdle: Thin to Medium
. Measurements: 6.88-6.83X5.16
. Light Performance: 0
. Polish: Ideal
. Symmetry: Ideal
. Culet: Pointed
. Fluorescence: Negligible
Number 2 H and VVS 2 ( I know this is a bit too high b/c it''s stuff I can''t see)
Shape: A Cut Above Princess
. Carat: 2.003
. Depth %: 74.8
. Table %: 72
. Crown Angle: 44.8
. Crown %: 12.7
. Pavilion Angle: 40.1
. Pavilion %: 59.4
. Girdle: Medium
. Measurements: 6.77-6.76X5.05
. Light Performance: 0
. Polish: Ideal
. Symmetry: Ideal
. Culet: Pointed
. Fluorescence: Negligible
The price diff b/w the 2 stones is not too large and my budget can handle either one.