but that’s the thing.... that is a term he uses to describe them. They are not graded that way because it isn’t a grading parameter. You and many others consider them excellent but not everyoneHi all, there are Ex Ovals, Rhino at August Vintage makes them, take a look at this video. No bow ties.
Exactly!!They are not graded that way because it isn’t a grading parameter.
Sorry if I misspoke, guess I have a lot more to learn, hope I can do that here.but that’s the thing.... that is a term he uses to describe them. They are not graded that way because it isn’t a grading parameter. You and many others consider them excellent but not everyone
WOW, sorry I used the wrong terminology.Exactly!!
There's a specific term "Excellent Cut Grade"
To a gemologist or educated consumer, the term is a GIA specific one.
AGSL uses the term "Ideal"
Of course, many sellers use both/ either term with no second thought- but this is a place where the correct terminology really matters.
Then the issue of "bow ties"
Many ovals do not have bow ties.
There are Oval Brilliant Diamonds that have different light performance ( larger facets) in the middle of the stone causing larger flashes of light emanating from the center of the diamond, as compared to the tips.
IN some cases, this effect can be absolutely gorgeous. In bad cases, the center is static dark, resembling a "bow tie".
So- there's many super well cut ovals that don't have bow ties- or others that use the look effectively.
But NONE of them are "EX" cut grade. Because it does not exist.
I don't think it's so much that people care that the celebrity has it as that celebrities more often than most people pick things that are different than the norm, and then people see them and find out about things they may not have known about, and sometimes like them. When my brother was shopping for an engagement ring for my SIL, she said she wanted one like Blake Lively's ring, which to me meant "big light pink oval on skinny rose gold pave band" but actually what she meant was just that she wanted a round brilliant rose gold solitaire, because nothing about Blake Lively's ring had registered to her but that she hadn't seen an engagement ring in rose gold before and really liked that a lot more than white or yellow for her skin tone (true - rose gold looks great on her). A lot of people may be seeing ovals on celebrities and liking how the elongated shape looks, having only seen rounds or princesses in person. We certainly know that the mall jewelry stores most people go to don't exactly have the most interesting selections to browse. So I think it's not really copying celebrities because they are celebrities, but copying them because the celebrity has something they haven't seen before and like more than what they can commonly see.People vary, but I can't wrap my brain around anyone caring, and copying, what some so-called celebrity wears.
Does that make them feel superior to regular people who are less "cool" or whatever today's term is?
How bout just wearing whatever you like?
Do you think you matter less than some famous person?
It comes across as a bit offputting when you lecture people who have known for ages about Elyque ovals about them as if we don't know, and the person you were specifically replying to is actually a diamond seller who knows a lot about fancy shapes and who, like Jonathan who designed the Elyque oval, has a very good eye for them. Read the room.WOW, sorry I used the wrong terminology.
And yes I’m not an educated “diamond” consumer, isn’t that what this site is for, for us consumers to learn?
Thank you for jumping on and setting me straight, I’m in elementary school just wanting to learn. Happy New YearSorry to have jumped on your post Sunshine! I'm a bit sensitive to how diamonds are described.
I'm sure Jon uses the correct terminology.
Yes, AGSL "Ideal" is the correct word to use.