dtnyc
Brilliant_Rock
- Joined
- Jul 27, 2005
- Messages
- 1,119
So I got engaged in August. My FI did a fabulous job on the ring all by himself. He had a family stone to work w/ (2.07 transitional brilliant cut) it''s on the warm side but so sparkly! I love it, it''s so special, because it was in a necklace of his grandmother''s I am so lucky that he had it to work with & that his family was so enthusiastic about him using it for my ring. He worked with an independent jeweler and had it mounted in a platinum basket setting with 3 side stones on each side. It''s a slightly different, but still traditional setting, the only one similar I have found is this A. Jaffe ring, but regular shank and the setting is a little different. I apologize for not having any good photos of it, but I haven''t mastered taking pictures of my own hand yet!
So here is my dilemma, what to put next to it?
I would like to have a diamond wedding band either eternity or something like a Michael B. lace ring, where there are clusters or stations of stones around the ring, as opposed to a 5 or 7 stone wedding ring.
I have a 9 stone platinum channel set ring- so I would just prefer something different- either stations/clusters of stones or going all the way around.
I am already thinking about custom spacer to go in between if needed- as I want to be able to wear my wedding band solo on occasion, (I don''t want to have a ring w/ diamonds in it that I wouldn''t be able to wear independently.)
As I said before I love the Michael B. lace rings- I think that the lace design really complements the setting of the side stones (FI said he thought my ring looked like a bouquet and I think that the Michael B echoes that) but unfortunately the stones are too white
- I need I-J''s to match the side stones.
Does anyone know of any other station/cluster bands out there? I feel that these rings should be less expensive than an eternity band (I figure eternity band can always be added on later for anniversary, kids, etc.)
If I was to go w/ an eternity band what size stones (should they match the smallest stones in the e-ring setting?) do you suggest?
All suggestions welcome-
Thank you!
So here is my dilemma, what to put next to it?
I would like to have a diamond wedding band either eternity or something like a Michael B. lace ring, where there are clusters or stations of stones around the ring, as opposed to a 5 or 7 stone wedding ring.
I have a 9 stone platinum channel set ring- so I would just prefer something different- either stations/clusters of stones or going all the way around.
I am already thinking about custom spacer to go in between if needed- as I want to be able to wear my wedding band solo on occasion, (I don''t want to have a ring w/ diamonds in it that I wouldn''t be able to wear independently.)
As I said before I love the Michael B. lace rings- I think that the lace design really complements the setting of the side stones (FI said he thought my ring looked like a bouquet and I think that the Michael B echoes that) but unfortunately the stones are too white

Does anyone know of any other station/cluster bands out there? I feel that these rings should be less expensive than an eternity band (I figure eternity band can always be added on later for anniversary, kids, etc.)
If I was to go w/ an eternity band what size stones (should they match the smallest stones in the e-ring setting?) do you suggest?
All suggestions welcome-

Thank you!