what do you think of this inclusion?

[roadtonowhere]

after much thought, my push present saga would be a bigger rb. I know.... I am so indecisive.
plugged the number in hca and it looks good. but i am concerned about the inclusions.

Now, what do you ladies and gents think of this inclusion? dangerous?
the comments says "additional twinning wisps and surface grain are not shown".
are the wisps dangerously close to edge that it might cause structural concern?
it is said to be eye clean from 10" but not 6".
thoughts?

 

[roadtonowhere]

33 views and no replies?
help.....

 

[Mrs.W 514]

You should post the entire GIA report and maybe a link to the stone so we can look at the picture of the stone. Where did you get the eye clean information from?
usually twining wisps don't compromise the stone structurally.

Here is some info
https://www.pricescope.com/wiki/diamonds/diamond-clarity

 

[diamondseeker2006]

I am clarity-picky, and I wouldn't like "not eyeclean at 6"). What is the clarity grade of the stone?

 

[JaneSmith]

"Not eyeclean at 6 inches." That would bother me. A lot.

 

[roadtonowhere]

clarity is SI1.
eye clean info from vendor.

I did read info about clarity on ehre and on the internet in general. but being me, i like to ask questions anyway.....

i cannot see them on the diamond image or IS. what is weird is that I can locate inclusions in the pics on other diamonds that are graded vs2 by the same vendor.

just curious as this is a good buy rather than going up to vs2.

Thanks dimondseeker and mrs w

 

[roadtonowhere]

so, whats the verdict? should I pass on this stone? I have included the Is and aset of this stone, taken from wf, the vendor.