- Sep 20, 2018
It would be 3ct with .50ct sidestones
Have you tried printing out the picture and cutting out all the stones and taping them together how they
would be set. That way you can see it without the halo. I'm wondering if you might want to go slightly
bigger on the pears?
I like these pears and think the proportions will be better once you remove the halo. As is, I think they're a tad small, but - without the halo - they should be perfect.
I'm currently putting together a smaller, more casual ring - 1.5ct with 2 x .25 pears - so, same proportions, basically, but half size. I think it will look great, so obviously I'm going to think yours will look perfect, too. I have a 3.05ct stone also which is currently set in a 3 stone, and I initially thought about putting pear sides on that one instead. The size I chose for it was .5ct each, but decided to go with the smaller one.
So all that to say, I think your proportions will be spot on! This should be really lovely!
Ok I’m stuck, I’ve now seen this setting which I love - which do you prefer with a round brilliant, tapered baguettes or pears
I personally prefer pears, but it's definitely just a personal preference rather than everyone's taste.