Eric, the issue here isn't whether a 8mm stone will be visibly larger than a 7.9mm, but the fact that the 2.01 H VS2 stone, though it sparkles, is not a well cut stone. If you view the 2.01 H VS2 side by side with another stone that fits within the recommended parameters posted earlier, you WILL see a visual difference in performance.Eric33w|1466707538|4047200 said:Yea I had them both outside in the sun and I was pretty impressed with the sparkle even compared to the triple excellent. I've just been hesitant to buy online because even if you look at the cert, you can never really tell until it's in your hand. Do you think there is a visible, physical difference to the naked eye between 7.91-7.95 vs 8.01-8.07?
+1. I wouldn't consider a 2 ct that was under 8.1mm minimum. Much better to buy a larger and better cut 1.96!Dancing Fire|1466813187|4047859 said:Looks too deep. A well cut 2ct should be closer to 8.10mm in diameter.