Thoughts on this round 1.45?

[c87]

While I love the spread and the bright white of the current one I purchased (60% table) (see this thread: [URL='https://www.pricescope.com/community/threads/thoughts-on-this-1-40-ct-60-table.197841/']https://www.pricescope.com/community/threads/thoughts-on-this-1-40-ct-60-table.197841/[/URL])

I don't know if we can get over the black inclusion in the middle of the table. So, I'm considering moving to a VS2, but dropping down to H. The diamond below is $1k more at $11.8k and am curious to get your thoughts:

Diamond 2:
https://myapps.gia.edu/ReportCheckPortal/getReportData.do?&reportno=1165180566&weight=1.45#

Also, I loved how white the G looked. Do you think I will be disappointed dropping to an H?

EDIT: If I want to stay at G while gaining VS2 this is also an option (has a larger table which I liked):

Diamond 3:
https://myapps.gia.edu/ReportCheckPortal/getReportData.do?&reportno=5156820555&weight=1.38

 

[c87]

Diamond 3:
I pulled this photo from Excel diamonds. It looks a little cloudy, does it not?

http://www.exceldiamonds.com/Diamonds-1/GIA-Graded-Round-Diamond-1-38-Carat-G-Color-VS2-Clarity-340532/Pics/I243863/orig.jpg

 

[c-k]

I think a G color to a H color would be very hard to tell in a setting...from SI1 to a VS2 you will still have to ask about eye clean. If eye clean in your mind means can't see inclusions with your own eyes without a loupe.

 

[JulieN]

I rather like this guy if the fluoro and inclusions check out: http://www.jamesallen.com/loose-diamonds/round-cut/1.61-carat-e-color-si2-clarity-excellent-cut-sku-263827

The 1.38 from Excel looks fine,

 

[diamondseeker2006]

I think #2 has potential and I am one who'd rather have a H VS2 than a G SI1. Do you have the pictures of it? You need to be able to see the inclusions in magnified images for one thing. #3 has such a low crown angle and I think that is unattractive from a profile view. The James Allen stone is too deep and faces up like a 1.5 ct stone as opposed to 1.6.

Excel picture is bad, not the diamond.

 

[c87]

Interested to get your thoughts on this one:

http://www.gia.edu/cs/Satellite?reportno=2166658475&childpagename=GIA%2FPage%2FReportCheck&pagename=GIA%2FDispatcher&c=Page&cid=1355954554547

This one came back eye clean as well.

 

[c-k]

More info please..picture image, lab report, Idealscope to see if it has potential, the numbers look ok.

 

[c87]

Trying to get picutres. What do you guys think of the angles and percentages?

 

[c87]

ll else aside, I'm concerned with the dimensions of diamond #1 in comparison to the 1.41 ct I just posted.