Laila619|1394148393|3628932 said:It's scoring only a 'very good' on fire and scintillation because of the 41 degree pavilion angle. Would have been better if it was 40.8 or 40.9. If you are really picky and want the best of the best, I would pass. If you absolutely love the stone, by all means get it! It will still be a beauty as it's AGS000.
redroze|1394149022|3628945 said:Laila619|1394148393|3628932 said:It's scoring only a 'very good' on fire and scintillation because of the 41 degree pavilion angle. Would have been better if it was 40.8 or 40.9. If you are really picky and want the best of the best, I would pass. If you absolutely love the stone, by all means get it! It will still be a beauty as it's AGS000.
From a quick search it looks like the 41 pavilion angle is not an issue when combined with a crown under 34.5.
https://www.pricescope.com/communit...erence-between-34-2-40-8-and-34-0-41-0.11202/
John Pollard|1392926535|3619475 said:HCA usage warnings here: https://www.pricescope.com/wiki/diamonds/holloway-cut-advisor
In Context
Just imagine that you're trying to get to know someone's looks and personality...
An HCA score is merely like having a chalk outline of the person.
Grading report numbers are like having the person's height, weight and clothing measurements.
An ASET or Ideal-Scope (for RB) image is like having a still photo of the person.
An AGS Platinum "0" in performance is like a panel of judges confirming that the person's personality and looks are solid.
A 3D scan in sophisticated cut-calculation software is like having a video interview with the person.
Eventually, it's a lot of great information. All told it's enough for an experienced cut-specialist to make very detailed performance predictions. But in the end, a live date (dinner & a movie?) will be how you finally judge total personality and looks as you, individually, perceive them.
I hope this is helpful.