- Joined
- Jul 23, 2012
- Messages
- 20,250
Niel|1390952775|3602961 said:Seems white. And eye clean. Nice size. I think it looks nice. How does ERD feel about it? How do you?
diamondseeker2006|1390980338|3603208 said:You are going to be waaay over budget if you start looking at stones much over 2 cts.
What is the clarity and price of the stone at ERD? I still think you should stick with I SI1. The one I linked from GOG is now reserved and then there is the one from WF:
http://www.whiteflash.com/loose-diamonds/round-cut-loose-diamond-2936493.htm ($18,913)
I still like this one and it could absolutely appear as large as her friend's 2 ct stones because theirs may not be as well cut.
http://www.goodoldgold.com/diamond/10549/
I'd just go with the ERD cast setting for the GOG stone.
I'd go with this for the WF stone and it is only $2250:
http://www.whiteflash.com/engagement-rings/diamond-settings/elena-diamond-engagement-ring-1363.htm
Niel|1390960825|3603035 said:Well I'm a supporter of sticking to your budget. Was it set for a reason? Do you really feel comfortable paying more?
I mean a 2 ct stone in a stone that's perfection vs a stone that's larger but a setting that isn't? I don't know. (Assuming you'd have to take some from the setting. )
Niel|1391003185|3603256 said:diamondseeker2006|1390980338|3603208 said:You are going to be waaay over budget if you start looking at stones much over 2 cts.
What is the clarity and price of the stone at ERD? I still think you should stick with I SI1. The one I linked from GOG is now reserved and then there is the one from WF:
http://www.whiteflash.com/loose-diamonds/round-cut-loose-diamond-2936493.htm ($18,913)
I still like this one and it could absolutely appear as large as her friend's 2 ct stones because theirs may not be as well cut.
http://www.goodoldgold.com/diamond/10549/
I'd just go with the ERD cast setting for the GOG stone.
I'd go with this for the WF stone and it is only $2250:
http://www.whiteflash.com/engagement-rings/diamond-settings/elena-diamond-engagement-ring-1363.htm
if i remember right its si1 and was under 15k. I think its a very nice price for the size and cut.
Im partial to that stone because it hits the 2ct make that you need, and is thousands cheaper, so it would allow you to get the best setting you could. I might suggest getting it home unset and see if you like the color and if the stone is eye clean. Id ask ERD if they would pay to ship it back after you get a look at it, if you arent in NYC. Or, sense this stone is a nice price, you could afford to get it home then set from SK or VC
Lenovo|1391039369|3603759 said:Niel|1390960825|3603035 said:Well I'm a supporter of sticking to your budget. Was it set for a reason? Do you really feel comfortable paying more?
I mean a 2 ct stone in a stone that's perfection vs a stone that's larger but a setting that isn't? I don't know. (Assuming you'd have to take some from the setting. )
Thanks. So am I as it goes to budgets, but the more I research diamonds, the more I want to get a bigger, sparkly one!
I figured if this is a one time deal, so might as well go all out.
Niel|1391040391|3603776 said:Lenovo|1391039369|3603759 said:Niel|1390960825|3603035 said:Well I'm a supporter of sticking to your budget. Was it set for a reason? Do you really feel comfortable paying more?
I mean a 2 ct stone in a stone that's perfection vs a stone that's larger but a setting that isn't? I don't know. (Assuming you'd have to take some from the setting. )
Thanks. So am I as it goes to budgets, but the more I research diamonds, the more I want to get a bigger, sparkly one!
I figured if this is a one time deal, so might as well go all out.
Honestly 2 ct is large. And you're looking at well cut diamonds so it will sparkle. And the setting is going to be amazing. Get the best thing you can for your budget. Don't stress yourself out abut getting the biggest diamond in the world. Someone will always have a bigger one.
Niel|1391042369|3603804 said:https://www.pricescope.com/community/threads/matatora%E2%80%99s-lockes-solitaire.43506/
Look at this thread. A 2.1 ish ct stone in a J color. Her finger size if I'm right was about 5 3/4 if in not mistaken.
Filled with people telling her how huge it looks
A size 5 is small. That will help the stone look even larger.
Just don't stress about size. Sure 2 ct is a dime a dozen on this site so it seems common but it's not. It's large. And I'm sure anything you get her she will love. Don't go more than your comfortable budget wise just to get a 2.5 or something. And a 2.25 won't look that much bigger than a 2 ct anyways.
Niel|1391135582|3604686 said:Keep in mind you'll have to allow yourself some time for the setting to be made. If you go hand forged, that's time.
I like both of those but of course they are more $$$
But that WF one plus the CAD ERD setting - how off budget is that?
Lenovo|1391137465|3604708 said:http://www.briangavindiamonds.com/diamonds/diamond-details/2.226-j-si1-round-diamond-ags-104068814002
http://www.briangavindiamonds.com/diamonds/diamond-details/2.288-i-si2-round-diamond-ags-104064814015
http://www.jamesallen.com/loose-diamonds/round-cut/2.31-carat-j-color-vs2-clarity-ideal-cut-sku-178815
Getting more and more expensive though...
Add about 3K to each one for the total project budget...
Niel|1391139911|3604743 said:so. Its 2 cts. BUT
its an I, its VS1, and its has strong fluor, which will make it look whiter in UV light. ( plus SBF iMHO is a super cool phenomenon)
http://www.ritani.com/diamonds/round-diamond-2-01-Carat-I-color-GIA-certified/D-DS5305
Id want them to look at it and make sure the fluor doesnt have negative effects but worth an inquiry.
Lenovo|1391220435|3605493 said:Niel|1391139911|3604743 said:so. Its 2 cts. BUT
its an I, its VS1, and its has strong fluor, which will make it look whiter in UV light. ( plus SBF iMHO is a super cool phenomenon)
http://www.ritani.com/diamonds/round-diamond-2-01-Carat-I-color-GIA-certified/D-DS5305
Id want them to look at it and make sure the fluor doesnt have negative effects but worth an inquiry.
Ok.
What should I inquire about exactly?
Niel|1391220501|3605495 said:Lenovo|1391220435|3605493 said:Niel|1391139911|3604743 said:so. Its 2 cts. BUT
its an I, its VS1, and its has strong fluor, which will make it look whiter in UV light. ( plus SBF iMHO is a super cool phenomenon)
http://www.ritani.com/diamonds/round-diamond-2-01-Carat-I-color-GIA-certified/D-DS5305
Id want them to look at it and make sure the fluor doesnt have negative effects but worth an inquiry.
Ok.
What should I inquire about exactly?
as for a picture, maybe. See what they say about the fluorescence.
Lenovo|1391220864|3605498 said:Niel|1391220501|3605495 said:Lenovo|1391220435|3605493 said:Niel|1391139911|3604743 said:so. Its 2 cts. BUT
its an I, its VS1, and its has strong fluor, which will make it look whiter in UV light. ( plus SBF iMHO is a super cool phenomenon)
http://www.ritani.com/diamonds/round-diamond-2-01-Carat-I-color-GIA-certified/D-DS5305
Id want them to look at it and make sure the fluor doesnt have negative effects but worth an inquiry.
Ok.
What should I inquire about exactly?
as for a picture, maybe. See what they say about the fluorescence.
Ok.
I will report back.
I also found this on WF:
http://www.whiteflash.com/loose-diamonds/round-cut-loose-diamond-2988587.htm
Lenovo said:Asked the virtual gemologist a lot of questions about the ritani stone.
She was really nice and informative.
Essentially told me to stay away if I have not seen very strong fluorescence.
Still searching...
teobdl|1391734268|3609617 said:Lenovo said:Asked the virtual gemologist a lot of questions about the ritani stone.
She was really nice and informative.
Essentially told me to stay away if I have not seen very strong fluorescence.
Still searching...
Did she clarify what she meant by that? Was she saying that the stone in question was milky or hazy??? Something like 99% of diamonds with fluorescence will just have a different color in certain lighting (usually turning blue-ish). Lots of people like this. Otherwise, there are no ill effects, at least not that I'm aware of.
Blue fluoro info: http://www.briangavindiamonds.com/diamond/brian-gavins-blue-diamonds-with-fluorescence/
You are getting a bonus discount with fluoro, as long as there is no milky or haziness.
Lenovo|1391735897|3609637 said:teobdl|1391734268|3609617 said:Lenovo said:Asked the virtual gemologist a lot of questions about the ritani stone.
She was really nice and informative.
Essentially told me to stay away if I have not seen very strong fluorescence.
Still searching...
Did she clarify what she meant by that? Was she saying that the stone in question was milky or hazy??? Something like 99% of diamonds with fluorescence will just have a different color in certain lighting (usually turning blue-ish). Lots of people like this. Otherwise, there are no ill effects, at least not that I'm aware of.
Blue fluoro info: http://www.briangavindiamonds.com/diamond/brian-gavins-blue-diamonds-with-fluorescence/
You are getting a bonus discount with fluoro, as long as there is no milky or haziness.
She said the diamond is not milky or hazy, BUT since I have not seen fluorescence in person, it may turn out to be a detriment. She stated that, in her opinion, stones with very strong fluorescence are disliked by many. I guess she was trying to steer me away from something that I may not be happy with...but she also said only a very small number of stones turn hazy and milky with fluorescence. She also said that in the shade like on a cloudy day, the fluorescence may not be flattering at all.