- Joined
- Sep 3, 2000
- Messages
- 6,746
I have been attempting to keep up with the chatter and printed information on the future of diamond cut grading. Cut parameters, such as those found in AGA, are going to play a part in the future of grading, but a major part will be light behavior grading. While the light performance of diamonds extends to many unusual configurations, good craftsmanship does not correlate in every respect to high light return. Therefore, there will be super performing diamonds that are eliminated from being the top grade of overall cut becuase they do not meet certain, as yet unrevealed cut parameters.
What does strike me now is that the simple Ideal-Scope gives a user an excellent idea of how well light is performing. If combined with AGA grading, you would be assured of a top cut stone. Top cut in AGS or GIA may well extend to different parameters, but it may be much more difficult for an appraiser to assess the GIA or AGS grade. These organizations may not make it easy for outsiders to reproduce their grading parameters. AGS says it will offer the software to members at some point, but GIA has no reason to offer this, other than many people would willingly pay to have it. I have not heard they are considering offering their grading software outside the lab.
So it may well be that the Ideal-Scope will become a very popular diamond dealer tool because it will tell a dealer if the stone is potentially a top cut stone regardless of parameters. As this light behavior strategy is adopted by the trade, it will filter down to consumers, who will also find the Ideal-Scope more and more useful in interpreting lab results. The major labs are, in essence, on the verge of adopting the strategy of Ideal-Scope grading although by a much more technical and quantitative approach.
What does strike me now is that the simple Ideal-Scope gives a user an excellent idea of how well light is performing. If combined with AGA grading, you would be assured of a top cut stone. Top cut in AGS or GIA may well extend to different parameters, but it may be much more difficult for an appraiser to assess the GIA or AGS grade. These organizations may not make it easy for outsiders to reproduce their grading parameters. AGS says it will offer the software to members at some point, but GIA has no reason to offer this, other than many people would willingly pay to have it. I have not heard they are considering offering their grading software outside the lab.
So it may well be that the Ideal-Scope will become a very popular diamond dealer tool because it will tell a dealer if the stone is potentially a top cut stone regardless of parameters. As this light behavior strategy is adopted by the trade, it will filter down to consumers, who will also find the Ideal-Scope more and more useful in interpreting lab results. The major labs are, in essence, on the verge of adopting the strategy of Ideal-Scope grading although by a much more technical and quantitative approach.