The entire CDC Vaccine Advisory Panel has been fired.

[Calliecake]

All 17 members have been fired. They are “considering” new members. Let’s take a wild guess at how many of the people they are considering are actually scientists and physicians.

 

[Lookinagain]

All 17 members have been fired. Can this country get any stupider?

I saw that. Another "mis-statement" during confirmation hearings. I guess we are supposed to go to a lawyer for our medical advice now.

 

[Calliecake]

I saw that. Another "mis-statement" during confirmation hearings. I guess we are supposed to go to a lawyer for our medical advice now.

He already said American’s shouldn’t be taking medical advice from him.

 

[Lookinagain]

He already said American’s shouldn’t be taking medical advice from him.

yeah, so maybe he should quit his day job.

 

[Calliecake]

On a completely different note we now have a 22 year old working as Head of Terrorism Prevention. He has no background in security. He was a gardener five years ago and was working as a grocery store assistant in August of 2023. Let that sink in for a moment.

 

[oliviawilde168]

It's frustrating to think that the new members might not have the scientific or medical background you'd expect or hope for in such a role.

cookie clicker​

 

[Lookinagain]

On a completely different note we now have a 22 year old working as Head of Terrorism Prevention. He has no background in security. He was a gardener five years ago and was working as a grocery store assistant in August of 2023. Let that sink in for a moment.

So they aren't worried about terrorism anymore? I see he he also interned for The Heritage Foundation.

 

[Matata]

I see he he also interned for The Heritage Foundation.

Association with The Heritage Foundation is a requirement for jobs now. Project 2025 is the policy manual.

 

[Lookinagain]

Association with The Heritage Foundation is a requirement for jobs now. Project 2025 is the policy manual.

Yes, I agree. There is a website called something like Project 2025 Tracker. They state the goals, which have been accomplished, which are in process and which haven't been started yet. It's pretty disturbing.

 

[Calliecake]

It's frustrating to think that the new members might not have the scientific or medical background you'd expect or hope for in such a role.

cookie clicker​

It’s more than frustrating. It’s putting all of our health at risk. They don’t care.

 

[Calliecake]

Eight new CDC Advisory Panel members have been named, including prominent vaccine skeptics.

 

[Lookinagain]

Eight new CDC Advisory Panel members have been named, including prominent vaccine skeptics.

not surprised at that.

 

[Matata]

I suspect the attitude of those making policy is that survival of the fittest is the way to go. Those who don't adapt quickly to emergent diseases will die and those left behind will be invincible super workers and reproducers. The details of what that means for society aren't on their radar.

 

[Rfisher]

I suspect the attitude of those making policy is that survival of the fittest is the way to go. Those who don't adapt quickly to emergent diseases will die and those left behind will be invincible super workers and reproducers. The details of what that means for society aren't on their radar.

I think what it means for society is very much well on some of the ‘their’ ‘s radar.
Part of the purpose and means.

 

[LightBright]

Eight new CDC Advisory Panel members have been named, including prominent vaccine skeptics.

Who are the prominent vaccine skeptics? My understanding is that none of the eight are against childhood vaccines or vaccines in general. I think one who has research experience with mRNA technology is an mRNA vaccine critic because it is a novel technique that has never had placebo clinical trials or trials for safety of the mRNA technique, itself.

Prior to COVID vaccine development the Adenoviral vector vaccine was also never proven safe, it too is novel. Clinical trial testing adenoviral vector vaccination (two HIV Trials) proved it to be negatively effective. Just in case it looks like I’m anti science, the large clinical trial on the efficacy of monoclonal antibodies, also a novel treatment, proved they were actually fairly safe and quite effective. The new RSV “vaccine” for infants is based on that monoclonal antibody technology.

We are right to be skeptical of the mRNA platform and the adenoviral vector technology to combat infectious viruses.

 

[telephone89]

Who are the prominent vaccine skeptics? My understanding is that none of the eight are against childhood vaccines or vaccines in general. I think one who has research experience with mRNA technology is an mRNA vaccine critic because it is a novel technique that has never had placebo clinical trials or trials for safety of the mRNA technique, itself.

Prior to COVID vaccine development the Adenoviral vector vaccine was also never proven safe, it too is novel. Clinical trial testing adenoviral vector vaccination (two HIV Trials) proved it to be negatively effective. Just in case it looks like I’m anti science, the large clinical trial on the efficacy of monoclonal antibodies, also a novel treatment, proved they were actually fairly safe and quite effective. The new RSV “vaccine” for infants is based on that monoclonal antibody technology.

We are right to be skeptical of the mRNA platform and the adenoviral vector technology to combat infectious viruses.

Do you have documentation of this? I just googled, and a bunch of scientific journals came up with with placebo trials.

 

[Calliecake]

@Light Bright, There are stories out by credible news sources regarding this story. To talk more about this may be breaking PS rules. I’m not willing to risk getting banned.