diamondfan
Super_Ideal_Rock
- Joined
- Jun 17, 2005
- Messages
- 11,016
Hey Gwen, I''m not sure if you are still doing this or not, or maybe you posted it already and I missed it... But if you haven''t finished it yet I have a revision... Final melee count from Leon is 1.88cts. Which gives me 5.92tcw.Date: 4/14/2008 3:23:35 PM
Author: CrookedRock
Gwen, I can''t wait to see the results!! I''ll add mine even though it isn''t on my finger for another couple of weeks... You can count it in if you''d like!
Original ERing:
Size 5
4.04 ct Cushion Brilliant
1ct melee (aprox)
5.04 tcw
Still working on it! I''m doing it on breaks between my grad school work, so it''ll be a while before I finish it. Thanks for the revised info, ma''am.Date: 5/4/2008 7:38:03 AM
Author: CrookedRock
Date: 4/14/2008 3:23:35 PM
Author: CrookedRock
Gwen, I can''t wait to see the results!! I''ll add mine even though it isn''t on my finger for another couple of weeks... You can count it in if you''d like!
Original ERing:
Size 5
4.04 ct Cushion Brilliant
1ct melee (aprox)
5.04 tcw
Hey Gwen, I''m not sure if you are still doing this or not, or maybe you posted it already and I missed it... But if you haven''t finished it yet I have a revision... Final melee count from Leon is 1.88cts. Which gives me 5.92tcw.
First upgrade December 2006 1.20 carat H, SI2 round brilliant
I''m not sure when I''ll be finished. I just started working on my master''s dissertation (which is due in mid-July), and this is my pet procrastination project to do when I need a break from working on the paper.Date: 5/5/2008 12:27:26 PM
Author: cectra79
When are you going to post results? I can''t wait!
Thanks for starting the thread!
The problem with using that thread is that it doesn't have all the specific info about each ring. Like, I don't know which rings of those are upgrades or original e-rings, and I (at least initially) want to make that distinction. There also are rings in the eye candy folder that aren't engagement rings at all--some are RHRs, some are anniversary rings, etc., and I don't think most of them are labeled. It just seems like it's: here's the ring, here are the basic stats, oogle the picture. Which is fine! It's great! But it doesn't have quite enough info for me, if that makes any sense.Date: 5/5/2008 1:25:27 PM
Author: surfgirl
Gwen, not that you want to actually do this but...have you considered cross referencing to really get a count? Like after you do the calculations from this thread, you could go through the entire ERING thread on SMTR, and note all the ct. weights (they're usually on there I think) and see if that list matches up with this list...That list has so many more rings than this one, it's almost more representative isn't it? This one is more 'rings of folks who are still around PS regularly', while the other thread is all the rings ever, isn't it? Hey, I dont want you to be bored during summer break...!