shape
carat
color
clarity

Single or double claw prongs for cushion?

acaw2015

Brilliant_Rock
Premium
Joined
Jun 30, 2015
Messages
910
Hi again!
As you probably know (I hope you aren't getting tired of me) I am working on a reset for my cushion solitaire.
I want the new setting to have four sharp claw prongs but simply can't decide on single or split/double claw. If I choose double, I think it will look best to have them slitghtly separated to show diamond between them.
I would love your feedback on this! What do you think would enhance the cushion shape the most? I think the prongs in my current setting make the stone look more square than rounded, but maybe that is because of the current roundish prongs.
/aca :wavey:
 

Gypsy

Super_Ideal_Rock
Joined
Aug 8, 2005
Messages
40,225
What size is the cushion? Who is the vendor?
 

acaw2015

Brilliant_Rock
Premium
Joined
Jun 30, 2015
Messages
910
Hi Gypsy!
It is the same cushion as in the picture, 1ct from GOG, square ca 5.89 mm. I am not based in the US and will be using a local jeweler and I am unfortunately not expecting the same quality as the ps recommended vendors. I am working through the local jewelers in my town, trying a third one this time and upping the budget... Should have had it set in the US before shipping it here... :nono: ;(
 

Gypsy

Super_Ideal_Rock
Joined
Aug 8, 2005
Messages
40,225
Definitely single.claw.then. No question.
 

acaw2015

Brilliant_Rock
Premium
Joined
Jun 30, 2015
Messages
910
Thank you for your reply Gypsy! Is it the size of the stone then that makes you say so? I am very grateful for your opinion on this!!
/aca :wavey:
 

acaw2015

Brilliant_Rock
Premium
Joined
Jun 30, 2015
Messages
910
Ok, never mind my question Gypsy. I found a thread where you explained this in detail. :doh:
Thank you! :wavey:
 

mrs-b

Super_Ideal_Rock
Premium
Joined
Aug 18, 2013
Messages
11,542
Agree with Gypsy on this. I think proportionately single claws will look better.
 

acaw2015

Brilliant_Rock
Premium
Joined
Jun 30, 2015
Messages
910
mrs-blop said:
Agree with Gypsy on this. I think proportionately single claws will look better.

Thanks! :wavey:

I think finding a setting is so difficult. I think I need to do some window shopping again to understand what I want. I have gone from wanting something modern to wanting something vintage-like to wanting your ring but with four prongs without going custom... Baahh :(sad

Oh well, it's a nice problem to have anyway and I do have my temp ring...

If anyone has any idea about what kind of setting would be nice, please post. :))
 

tyty333

Super_Ideal_Rock
Premium
Joined
Dec 17, 2008
Messages
27,195
Single claws...it's a beautiful stone and proportionately I woudn't want to cover too much of it up. Double claws only work on
really large stones for me.
 

EvangelineG

Brilliant_Rock
Joined
Feb 25, 2014
Messages
560
I have double claws on a 1 ct AVR, and I think they are very beautiful and do not overpower BUT they are finely done by David Klass. If I had to go with someone local, I wouldn't consider trying to get double claws, unless I had seen examples of excellent double claws by the bench I was planning on using, otherwise it's just a recipe for disappointment. I asked to see examples of single and double claws when I was shopping for custom setting vendors locally, and saw some really, really , reeeeeaaaaallly poor execution on both. :blackeye: It doesn't seem to be a skill that your average bench has around here.

So I would only go for single claws locally, and I would ask for examples and not assume that a bench could do nicely even on single ones. Good luck!
 

Rockinruby

Ideal_Rock
Joined
Dec 27, 2013
Messages
2,740
Another vote for single claws. :wavey: Btw, your diamond is lovely! :appl:
 

acaw2015

Brilliant_Rock
Premium
Joined
Jun 30, 2015
Messages
910
tyty333 said:
Single claws...it's a beautiful stone and proportionately I woudn't want to cover too much of it up. Double claws only work on
really large stones for me.

Thank you!! :)) This is what I need to hear, makes my decision so much easier.
 

acaw2015

Brilliant_Rock
Premium
Joined
Jun 30, 2015
Messages
910
EvangelineG|1452267777|3972636 said:
I have double claws on a 1 ct AVR, and I think they are very beautiful and do not overpower BUT they are finely done by David Klass. If I had to go with someone local, I wouldn't consider trying to get double claws, unless I had seen examples of excellent double claws by the bench I was planning on using, otherwise it's just a recipe for disappointment. I asked to see examples of single and double claws when I was shopping for custom setting vendors locally, and saw some really, really , reeeeeaaaaallly poor execution on both. :blackeye: It doesn't seem to be a skill that your average bench has around here.

So I would only go for single claws locally, and I would ask for examples and not assume that a bench could do nicely even on single ones. Good luck!

Thank you so much for this advice, truly appreciate it! I will ask to see examples. I am pretty sure that I will not do double claws anyways, but I will make sure they can make nice single claw prongs... And oh I so understand what you're saying, my last setting had some very disappointing prongs. :nono: I didnt even understand that that could even be an issue!

Thanks!! :wavey:
 

acaw2015

Brilliant_Rock
Premium
Joined
Jun 30, 2015
Messages
910
Rockinruby|1452271714|3972675 said:
Another vote for single claws. :wavey: Btw, your diamond is lovely! :appl:

Thank you so much Rockinruby! So nice of you to say. :) I really like it and hope I will find a nice setting for it!
 

Michael_E

Brilliant_Rock
Trade
Joined
Nov 19, 2003
Messages
1,290
Everyone's advising single claw prongs, so I'll just throw in a vote for double claw prongs. While I do agree that a single claw prong looks slightly better than double claw prongs, you still need to take into account how to keep the stone from twisting and becoming loose. Most cushion shaped diamonds have rounded corners and those corners are the longest dimension on the stone. This means that in order for the stone to stay in place it can not twist at all, (since any twisting makes the distance between the contact points on the prongs shorter). Diamonds are slippery and holding a rounded corner with the prong alone is just not possible. The only way to keep this twisting from occurring with single claw prongs is by making the pavilion of the stone touch the upper rail of the basket in at least two places per corner. This is fine mechanically, but then produces an area which is touching or very close to the stone all around, becoming a dirt catcher and making the stone very hard to clean, (pretty much impossible without an ultrasonic cleaner and steam blaster). If you're insistent on using single prongs, then make sure that you can take the ring in for cleaning quite often, (or better yet, get the tools and clean it yourself once a week).
 

acaw2015

Brilliant_Rock
Premium
Joined
Jun 30, 2015
Messages
910
Michael_E|1452285341|3972835 said:
Everyone's advising single claw prongs, so I'll just throw in a vote for double claw prongs. While I do agree that a single claw prong looks slightly better than double claw prongs, you still need to take into account how to keep the stone from twisting and becoming loose. Most cushion shaped diamonds have rounded corners and those corners are the longest dimension on the stone. This means that in order for the stone to stay in place it can not twist at all, (since any twisting makes the distance between the contact points on the prongs shorter). Diamonds are slippery and holding a rounded corner with the prong alone is just not possible. The only way to keep this twisting from occurring with single claw prongs is by making the pavilion of the stone touch the upper rail of the basket in at least two places per corner. This is fine mechanically, but then produces an area which is touching or very close to the stone all around, becoming a dirt catcher and making the stone very hard to clean, (pretty much impossible without an ultrasonic cleaner and steam blaster). If you're insistent on using single prongs, then make sure that you can take the ring in for cleaning quite often, (or better yet, get the tools and clean it yourself once a week).

Wow! Ok. Great input, it really does make sense what you write about the cushion shape. Yes I have noticed that it is quite hard to clean my current ring and dirt gets stuck on areas where the stone sits close to the setting. The prongs are rather wide and sit close to the stone and the stone is also close to the horizontal bars in the setting (basket) like you describe re the pavilion! I use an ultra sonic cleaner often, it is the only way to really remove dirt from those places, but had hoped that wouldnt be necessary with a new setting...

I guess this means that a setting like a four prong single claw classic tiffany is out of the question? Unless the prongs are wide and touching the pavilion...

Oh what to do! I have to say that your post makes so much sense that I am starting to feel that I will have to find a jeweler who can make me a double prong setting.... :errrr:

Thank you so much for your view on this!! :wavey:

Edited to add: obviously (and luckily) the prongs sit close to the stone... I mean in the design where the prongs are following the stone down girdle-pavilion. :loopy:
 

Gypsy

Super_Ideal_Rock
Joined
Aug 8, 2005
Messages
40,225
Micheal, I agree that structurally double claw prongs would be best on a cushion. The problem is I've never seen them done well but an unknown bench. They end up overlarge and overtaking the stone, and the wearer ends up hating it.

On a solitaire and done by a good bench even at a carat double prongs would be nice. But the bench is unknown.
 

acaw2015

Brilliant_Rock
Premium
Joined
Jun 30, 2015
Messages
910
Gypsy said:
Micheal, I agree that structurally double claw prongs would be best on a cushion. The problem is I've never seen them done well but an unknown bench. They end up overlarge and overtaking the stone, and the wearer ends up hating it.

On a solitaire and done by a good bench even at a carat double prongs would be nice. But the bench is unknown.

:errrr: ;(

Well, on the positive side I am now aware of the problem. Your responses make me aware of what I need to ask and see from any potential jeweler... I guess I have some work to do!
 

Gypsy

Super_Ideal_Rock
Joined
Aug 8, 2005
Messages
40,225
Make sure you find a bench that has nice claw prongs and confirm they did them in house s.

You want them small if there are two. One prong would be larger (and easier).

Personally, I would download pictures of bad double claw prongs and show them to them and say "I DO NOT WANT THIS".
 

Gypsy

Super_Ideal_Rock
Joined
Aug 8, 2005
Messages
40,225
And this is just bad.

_35941.jpg
 

acaw2015

Brilliant_Rock
Premium
Joined
Jun 30, 2015
Messages
910
Thanks Gypsy! I will do that! Both pictures of what I like and what I don't want. I was a bit naive last time and didnt even discuss the prongs before having the ring made... I will make sure I know what they can do before committing this time. We'll see if I can find someone to make it.
Really appreciate your advice!

Edited to add: you posted before my post! Thank you so much for those links!! Youre the best!! I hope the owners of those rings wont read this thread. :halo: ;-) :))
 

Gypsy

Super_Ideal_Rock
Joined
Aug 8, 2005
Messages
40,225

For me the prongs are very big for double prongs. If those were single they'd be great thickness. It's a cast head and that's usually the problem. With cast prongs they have to be thicker because it doesn't have the same strength as hand forged wire.

Compare that head to this: https://www.pricescope.com/files/images/IMG_6205.JPG and even this: http://www.moissaniteco.com/temp/pics/radiant-double-claw-2.jpg

And yes, I will find some "good examples'.
But pretty much all you have to do is look on Leon Mege and Steven Kirsch and Victor Canera's sites.

You need handforged head for proper double prongs on a 1 carat stone.
 

Gypsy

Super_Ideal_Rock
Joined
Aug 8, 2005
Messages
40,225

Michael_E

Brilliant_Rock
Trade
Joined
Nov 19, 2003
Messages
1,290
One other option, if you want to accentuate the squareness of the cushion, is to use a fairly wide chevron prong and forming the top of the prong into a sort of fishtail looking affair. This attached image was something I made up for a client over ten years ago and it worked pretty well. As long as the stone seat matches the curvature of the stone and the prong is wide enough, it will keep the stone from moving around.

green_tourmaline_diamond_engraved2.jpg
 

acaw2015

Brilliant_Rock
Premium
Joined
Jun 30, 2015
Messages
910
Gypsy: thank you! Very informative! And I see the difference. Ok, very good advice re hand forged/cast prongs... Not sure I can find anything but cast here though, but I will ask and see.

The double prong detail is a final finish right? What I am thinking is, could I order a setting or perhaps only the head, for my stone from one of the recommended vendors and have a jeweler here set the stone..? Not sure this is even possible since it is a cushion though, I guess it is hard to make a setting without having the stone IRL. But since the prong detail is a final finish it may not even make any great difference and would perhaps only be a waste of time. I really dont want to send my stone to the US again, half way around the world.

I am seriously thinking about setting my cushion in a pendant instead and getting a round stone for a solitaire. :(sad

But I will give the local jewelers a chance to get it right before giving up.

Michael_E: thank you!! You have given me a lot to think about! :wavey:
 

alamana

Shiny_Rock
Joined
Sep 18, 2015
Messages
195
Quest Jewelers did double claws at the top of my 1.5 carat pear and they seem almost invisible. I love them.
 

alamana

Shiny_Rock
Joined
Sep 18, 2015
Messages
195
Gypsy|1452289955|3972887 said:
And this is just bad.

Yikes. That ring is all prong.
 
Be a part of the community Get 3 HCA Results
Top