HoratioNelson
Rough_Rock
- Joined
- Apr 11, 2013
- Messages
- 84
After months of waiting, the engagement ring being made for my finacee was finally ready in early November (original thread with pictures is here: https://www.pricescope.com/community/threads/another-cushion-halo-split-shank.194942/
A couple of days after we received the ring, I started to notice what I think is a slight imperfection in the setting.
Basically, on one side (north/south) of the stone, there is a significantly larger gap between the edge of the stone and the inside lip of the halo than there is on the opposite side. This isn't entirely noticeable when viewing the ring perpendicularly face down; however, when you look from 45 degrees or tilt it somewhat, the gap is quite obvious to me.
As we didn't want a rub-over setting, I expect that there would be some gap (however small) so that the claws can come from underneath to secure the stone. But this just doesn't seem symmetrical or right to me.
I have raised this with the jeweller who said he got the setter to take a closer look at it to try and tweak it, but didn't have much luck. He admits that he probably made the halo bezel ever so slightly too large, but given the type of ring it is, there is no easy remedy other than effectively making it again from scratch.
Before delivery of the ring, I have paid the jeweller half of the price he quoted for making this ring (half of approx $3,300/£2,000) as a deposit; however, I'm reluctant to hand over the balance until this is sorted out. Am I being unreasonable here? Are there any experts on here who can think of a way to perhaps eliminate/minimise this gap? The stone in question is only graded "good" (GIA) on symmetry and he has previously said that the shape of the stone would not make setting easy, but I still don't think that's a justification for this gap being there.
Below are photos showing the top side and the bottom side of the stone - notice how one has a much greater gap.


A couple of days after we received the ring, I started to notice what I think is a slight imperfection in the setting.
Basically, on one side (north/south) of the stone, there is a significantly larger gap between the edge of the stone and the inside lip of the halo than there is on the opposite side. This isn't entirely noticeable when viewing the ring perpendicularly face down; however, when you look from 45 degrees or tilt it somewhat, the gap is quite obvious to me.
As we didn't want a rub-over setting, I expect that there would be some gap (however small) so that the claws can come from underneath to secure the stone. But this just doesn't seem symmetrical or right to me.
I have raised this with the jeweller who said he got the setter to take a closer look at it to try and tweak it, but didn't have much luck. He admits that he probably made the halo bezel ever so slightly too large, but given the type of ring it is, there is no easy remedy other than effectively making it again from scratch.
Before delivery of the ring, I have paid the jeweller half of the price he quoted for making this ring (half of approx $3,300/£2,000) as a deposit; however, I'm reluctant to hand over the balance until this is sorted out. Am I being unreasonable here? Are there any experts on here who can think of a way to perhaps eliminate/minimise this gap? The stone in question is only graded "good" (GIA) on symmetry and he has previously said that the shape of the stone would not make setting easy, but I still don't think that's a justification for this gap being there.
Below are photos showing the top side and the bottom side of the stone - notice how one has a much greater gap.

