- Joined
- Jun 19, 2010
- Messages
- 3,602
athenaworth|1291859113|2791645 said:Is it possible to find good pre-set ruby jewelry for around $500? I recently lost someone very dear to me and his birthday was in July. I'd like to get something ruby to remember him by, but can't go much higher than $500. Am I kidding myself?
athenaworth|1291859113|2791645 said:Is it possible to find good pre-set ruby jewelry for around $500? I recently lost someone very dear to me and his birthday was in July. I'd like to get something ruby to remember him by, but can't go much higher than $500. Am I kidding myself?
tourmaline_lover|1291865152|2791734 said:athenaworth|1291859113|2791645 said:Is it possible to find good pre-set ruby jewelry for around $500? I recently lost someone very dear to me and his birthday was in July. I'd like to get something ruby to remember him by, but can't go much higher than $500. Am I kidding myself?
I'm so sorry for your loss.
It's possible to fine preset sapphires, emeralds and rubies for $500, but they won't be high quality, and they may be lead glass filed, synthetic, or diffused (dyed), and if not, they would have a brown mask and/or be opaque and very small. Like any gem, there are poor, good, and more fine (expensive) qualities. It depends on what you want and what treatments you're willing to accept.
ILander, Costco doesn't fully disclose their treatments, so if it's heated, assume diffused, or lead glass filled too.
VapidLapid|1291865900|2791752 said:However if you do as many here do, that is source the stone yourself and then find a setting for it and have a good bench jewler set the stone, you can get much better while staying in your budget. That also makes for a more personal momento. You want a ruby because that was the birthstone of the one you lost. Rubies in that price range are almost always treated. Are you ok with treatments? Are there any that you will accept and/or any that you would not? Many people in this forum like spinel, not just as ruby alternative. For a very long time red spinels were rubies, it wasn't until spinel was discovered to be a mineral in its own right that they were separated. Since the birthsone designations predate the separation of ruby and spinel by millenia, maybe a spinel would be a good alternate choice; a compromise without a loss.
Lovinggems|1291887652|2791931 said:How about this sweet little pendant?
http://www.acstones.com/productcart/pc/viewPrd.asp?idcategory=141&idproduct=3492
tourmaline_lover|1291867141|2791779 said:No offense to Costco, or you either iLander, but I would not accept anyone's "word" for treatment. I would want a reputable lab report. They use IGI, and I saw a sapphire there, it was $29,000 (expensive for Costco), and all the IGI report stated about the treatment was that "sapphires are commonly treated." Okay, so what treatment? Was this one treated? Um, am I supposed to guess? That was disconcerting to me, especially for the price. I also don't trust buyers of gems/jewelry for even large corporations to always know what they're doing. I found a pink CZ at CD Peacock (an old and supposedly reputable jewelry store), and they insisted it was a natural stone, they do not sell fake stones, and it was a tourmaline. It screamed CZ - it was machine cut, and had the luster, and RI and fire of a CZ (think pink ice) but I couldn't argue with them. They said their buyer bought it as pink tourmaline. I guessed that it was simulated pink tourmaline and the buyer didn't know any better.
Well, like you said, at least the return policy is good. Just make sure you get what you pay for. They also have synthetic rubies, and other gems as a more affordable alternative, and at least you know what you're getting for sure there.
Sorry for the tread hijack.