I''m sorry if this post runs long...I finally got my numbers on the stone I''m probably going to buy. Here goes:
GIA Cert:
Report: GIA (2002)
Cut: Emerald
Measurements: 8.28 x 6.24 x 4.33mm (1.33 length to width ratio)
Weight: 2.03 carat
Depth: 69.4%
Table: 68%
Girdle: Extremely thin to thick
Culet: none
Polish: VG
Symmetry: VG
Clarity: IF
Color: F
Fluorescene: None
Report from Jeweler:
Total Depth: 69.4% (4.32 mm)
Crown Angle: 50.7 (37.4-64.0)
Crown Height: 10.4% (10.9-9.9)
Pavilion Angle: 57.8 (57.6-58.0)
Pavilion Depth: 56.5% (56.1-56.9)
Table Size: 70.3% (4.38 mm)
Girdle Thickness: 2.5% (2.4-2.6)
Why is the table % different in this report?
Also...there is also a "topdown graph" that shows Table 0.8% and Culet 0.6%
One last thing: I was concerned about the "extremely thin to thick" girdle, so the jeweler provided a girdle report.
One sheet shows the megascope report: it shows a series of lines and there is one "dip" in the girdle (doesn''t really look wavy, however). It shows 2.4-2.6 and shows bezel: 2.5 (2.4-2.6) Halv: 0.0 and Valley 0.0.
There is a final report on the girdle showing a regular round diamond shape with a series of numbers running from 7 (at 12
0) clockwise to 8, 1, 2, 3 (at 6
0), 4, 5, 6 then to 7 (back at 12
0).
I really appreciate the forum for being patient with me during this purchase (just nerves, you know?) and all the info in this long post. And thanks especially to Richard for dealing with all my questions.
GIA Cert:
Report: GIA (2002)
Cut: Emerald
Measurements: 8.28 x 6.24 x 4.33mm (1.33 length to width ratio)
Weight: 2.03 carat
Depth: 69.4%
Table: 68%
Girdle: Extremely thin to thick
Culet: none
Polish: VG
Symmetry: VG
Clarity: IF
Color: F
Fluorescene: None
Report from Jeweler:
Total Depth: 69.4% (4.32 mm)
Crown Angle: 50.7 (37.4-64.0)
Crown Height: 10.4% (10.9-9.9)
Pavilion Angle: 57.8 (57.6-58.0)
Pavilion Depth: 56.5% (56.1-56.9)
Table Size: 70.3% (4.38 mm)
Girdle Thickness: 2.5% (2.4-2.6)
Why is the table % different in this report?
Also...there is also a "topdown graph" that shows Table 0.8% and Culet 0.6%
One last thing: I was concerned about the "extremely thin to thick" girdle, so the jeweler provided a girdle report.
One sheet shows the megascope report: it shows a series of lines and there is one "dip" in the girdle (doesn''t really look wavy, however). It shows 2.4-2.6 and shows bezel: 2.5 (2.4-2.6) Halv: 0.0 and Valley 0.0.
There is a final report on the girdle showing a regular round diamond shape with a series of numbers running from 7 (at 12



I really appreciate the forum for being patient with me during this purchase (just nerves, you know?) and all the info in this long post. And thanks especially to Richard for dealing with all my questions.