diamondseeker2006|1455550632|3991280 said:Okay, here's a variety. I do not like SI2's because you can't tell whether their inclusions might hamper light performance and sometimes the eyeclean factor is a problem. I always recommend SI1 or higher for an engagement ring even if it means going smaller in a stone. It would help to know your budget, though.
http://www.goodoldgold.com/ecommerce/1.16ct-i-si1-ascendancy-round-hearts-and-arrows-diamond.html
http://www.jamesallen.com/loose-diamonds/round-cut/1.17-carat-h-color-si1-clarity-excellent-cut-sku-844007
https://www.victorcanera.com/diamonds/06nmlu-1.154-i-si1-ideal-hearts-arrows-round#cmp=prds
http://www.whiteflash.com/loose-diamonds/round-cut-loose-diamond-3597942.htm?source=pricescope
https://www.victorcanera.com/diamonds/3pdewn-1.181-h-vs2-ideal-hearts-arrows-round#cmp=prds
ringo865|1455583874|3991421 said:What color do you typically search for?
gnc01|1455551218|3991283 said:diamondseeker2006|1455550632|3991280 said:Okay, here's a variety. I do not like SI2's because you can't tell whether their inclusions might hamper light performance and sometimes the eyeclean factor is a problem. I always recommend SI1 or higher for an engagement ring even if it means going smaller in a stone. It would help to know your budget, though.
Thank you for the links... For the diamond alone I'm looking to be around $4500 to 5000 USD... I also noticed on those links that the colour is not what I typically search for... I suppose it is not that important versus the other specs?
gnc01|1455624429|3991564 said:Thanks for the info. Is it easy to tell the colour difference between a f vs a g or h diamond when placed in the setting? Should the halo diamonds have the same colour diamonds as well?
If you prefer a colorless stone go for it!..gnc01|1455669553|3991825 said:Thanks for all the responses so far... I'm going to go search for some and post what I find to get some opinions.
Just to confirm, going colourless D-F isn't recommended? I've seen the difference when comparing them side by side. But, I'm sure in the setting a G will likely look the same?
gnc01|1455669553|3991825 said:Thanks for all the responses so far... I'm going to go search for some and post what I find to get some opinions.
Just to confirm, going colourless D-F isn't recommended? I've seen the difference when comparing them side by side. But, I'm sure in the setting a G will likely look the same?
ADN|1455673611|3991858 said:Full disclosure - I can't comment on specific stones posted on the forum because I'm in the trade and sell diamonds/jewellery.
But keep in mind these general tips when dealing with SI clarity:
- You want to make sure it's eye-clean - - there are varying definitions of this, but basically if you can't see anything in the stone without magnification at a normal viewing distance, then it should be fine.
- Look for light coloured or colourless inclusions that are wispy or scattered throughout the stone, & stay away from big solid black inclusions as these are usually much easier to see with the naked eye.
- Position of inclusions - if you can find a stone where the main inclusion is right on the girdle, you might be able to cover it with a claw...instant VS clarity once set- - also, if you can find something where the main inclusions are not right under the table, there's a better chance they'll get lost in the sparkle of the stone - directly under the table are much easier to see.
- Surface reaching (or open) inclusions are undesirable.
- Watch out for any inclusions that may represent a durability issue (pretty rare in SI goods, but worth being aware of)
Hope this helps