Ready to buy-Need final nod-Please help!

[pinkprashu]

Which diamond of the 3 in the picture would you prefer?

Please look at my post here for the sarin and idealscope for the diamond I am interested in.

https://www.pricescope.com/community/threads/what-do-you-think-of-this-diamond.75375/

 

[Shay37]

I like the 1.08. The numbers are nice. I LOVE the big fat arrows. It looks visibly larger than the other two. Win-Win-Win.

shay

 

[diamondseeker2006]

Date: 1/2/2008 7:41:37 PM
Author: Shay37
I like the 1.08. The numbers are nice. I LOVE the big fat arrows. It looks visibly larger than the other two. Win-Win-Win.

shay

Ditto, the size is a real bonus!

 

[wen104]

#3 for sure, love the arrows. Ow don''t forget pictures when you get it!

 

[pinkprashu]

I am considering the 1.01 diamond because it is atleast 400$ cheaper than the other 2.

But now I am not sure. Really did not want to go over my 5000$ budget.

What is you opinion on the 1st diamond. Could you please take a look at the sarin report and idealscope?

Is it worth buying for 4700$?

 

[milton333]

#1 is a great diamond. #3 seems a tiny hair larger in the magnified pic you''ve got, only when side by side with the others, and is almost certainly not worth going over your budget for. I think #1 is a winner, good job.

 

[Kaleigh]

If #1 if eye clean, it looks like a winner. I''m all for staying within your budget. Best of luck, please let us know what you decide.

 

[diamondseeker2006]

Oh well, someone needs to give you the other viewpoint!

I don''t think $400 is much in the overall scheme of things over the many years she will wear the ring. We went WAAAY over the amount we originally planned to spend for my anniversary diamond, so I think $400 is a bargain to get the extra size! I''d never suggest anyone go heavily into debt to buy a ring, but you''re doing good if you only go $400 over!

 

[carabella]

I''d prefer #3 because it looks a bit larger in comparison to the other two and the arrows are nice and fat.

 

[Ellen]

Ladies, Pink didn''t mention it, but I believe this is for a pendant, right Pink? If that is still the case, I would go with #1. It''s lovely, and definitely big enough!

If it was for a ring, I would agree with those that said go bigger, but #1 is fine for a pendant.

 

[pinkprashu]

That is correct Ellen. It is for a pendant. (I just spoke to Selena at WF)According to her, #1 would have been considered as a cut above diamond if the table was 58% instead of 58.2%. And since the lower girdle % is 80% the diamond has more fire and brilliance that a diamond with the say 75%. That makes me happy because this diamond was not part of their A Cut above or Expert selection. They will still honor the return policy/upgrade policy etc. as they do for their ACA or Export selection diamonds.

I asked her to take a picture of this diamond at the center instead of off center. I will post it as soon as she sends it. Mean while take a look at the idealscope image

 

[Ellen]

Pink, it didn''t attach, but I''ll drag it on here for you. The diamond looks just gorgeous, I don''t see any reason not to get it (as long as it''s eyeclean).

 

[pinkprashu]

Here is the H sI1 diamond maginified 40x. It is eye clean.