- Joined
- Jan 2, 2017
- Messages
- 1,851
From what I've heard about Robbins Brothers and Kays (they have similar equivalents here in Australia), their workmanship is sub-par. And most reputable jewellers (small or large) would usually give you those things you are talking about re: cleaning and polishing.
I suspect you are probably right about Kay and Robbins. I'd much rather go with a jeweler with greater skill. It's just very difficult to know who to trust. I take my diamond in to get it set.... how do I know the diamond I see when I come back in 4 weeks is the one I gave them? Ok, I take the ring to some other store to have them see if the diamond in it matches the certificate. Now I take the ring back to the smaller (unknown) jeweler for a resize or a polish. Again, how do I know they haven't pulled a switcharoo?
I'm struggling with the idea that I'm basically buying a small car to put on my girlfriend's finger, and I just don't know who I can trust to do the work on it. I don't want to go with Kay or Robbins, but at least in those cases they have a large chain behind them and it seems less likely they'd pull something shady and risk damaging the value of the entire brand/chain.
In my opinion, that 2.4 marquise will perform (i.e., sparkle) very well, based on the 360 video and the ASET. I have not looked at any of the other stones suggested in this thread, or what is currently available on the online market. In my past experience, only about 1 in 10 of marquise or pear diamonds available online are worth a second look, so if you find a nicely cut one that meets your budget and specs, you should consider striking sooner rather than later. To be clear, this 2.4ct marquise is one of these rare good ones.
If you decide to go for it, do make use of the vendor's return period -- i.e., see for yourself if you're happy with the way it sparkles under various lighting conditions. Do be careful to keep the diamond clean while you're inspecting it though, as oil (e.g. fingerprints) can drastically worsen the appearance/performance of any diamond.
Good luck!
I'm hoping that the marquise doesn't veer TOO far into the crushed ice side of things, though I don't mind a bit of it. This video just makes the two brilliant cut cushions look so much shinier than the crushed ice modified cut. But I won't really know until I see this marquise in person!
JTK,
As far as I can tell, "your" 2.40ct marquise has very little crushed ice, and its light return (appearance) will be dominated by the larger, "crisp" facets characteristic of brilliant cuts. That being said, the appearance of "crushed ice" diamonds in videos and photos can be misleading, as cameras are unable to focus properly on virtual facets with very long ray paths (which are what you get in crushed ice diamonds). Thus, in my opinion, evaluation of crushed ice diamonds should be done in person.
I have no direct experience with JA workmanship for settings, but the sense I get from PS forums is that the opinion depends on what style of setting you are considering. Are there any of the settings suggested in this thread that you are leaning towards?