Pros: How would you rank these diamonds?

[downloadduckss]

1) http://www.jamesallen.com/diamonds/G-VVS2-Ideal-Cut-Princess-Diamond-1378927.asp
2) http://www.jamesallen.com/diamonds/G-VS1-Ideal-Cut-Princess-Diamond-1377333.asp
3) http://www.jamesallen.com/diamonds/G-VS2-Ideal-Cut-Princess-Diamond-1378670.asp
4) http://www.jamesallen.com/diamonds/F-VS2-Ideal-Cut-Princess-Diamond-1380010.asp
5) http://www.jamesallen.com/diamonds/F-VS1-Ideal-Cut-Princess-Diamond-1353416.asp

-----------------
When you rate them, would you also please provide your reasoning?

Thanks
DD

 

[stone-cold11]

1 looks nice, good even brightness and patterning. Good candidate to ask for ASET image. Only bad thing is the girdle which is thick, might be hiding some weight depending on the location and extent of the thick part.

 

[Amys Bling]

Personally, I would request ASET images for 1, 2, and 4. I like the patterning of 2 and 4 a lot and would use the ASET images to see which of those are cut the best and gave the most fire and brilliance.

 

[tyty333]

I like the look of number 2 the best. Some of the stones look like they have very big tables which I'm not fond of.
Get asets images for the ones you like and post.