All - I'm trying to decide between two very similar AGS000/H&A stones for an engagement ring, one with strong blue fluorescence and one with none. The strong blue is discounted about 6%, which is within Rapaport's guidelines for its color and clarity.
My concern with the strong blue is that it won't be worth as much, or won't find as many buyers, as the non-fluorescent stone in a resale situation. (Not that I anticipate ever selling it, but... just playing it safe on a $20K+ investment.) I know about the GIA study, that most fluorescent stones don't have a milky appearance, that fluorescent vs non is largely a matter of taste, but I'm sensing that the reality in the market is that people in the trade shy away from fluorescent stones because it's "just another variable to consider" that creates fear, uncertainty and doubt in consumers' minds.
I know fluorescent stones SHOULDN'T necessarily be discounted or considered less desirable, but what has everyone here found to be the REALITY in terms of pricing and reselling them? I'd be very interested in hearing any opinions or experiences.
My concern with the strong blue is that it won't be worth as much, or won't find as many buyers, as the non-fluorescent stone in a resale situation. (Not that I anticipate ever selling it, but... just playing it safe on a $20K+ investment.) I know about the GIA study, that most fluorescent stones don't have a milky appearance, that fluorescent vs non is largely a matter of taste, but I'm sensing that the reality in the market is that people in the trade shy away from fluorescent stones because it's "just another variable to consider" that creates fear, uncertainty and doubt in consumers' minds.
I know fluorescent stones SHOULDN'T necessarily be discounted or considered less desirable, but what has everyone here found to be the REALITY in terms of pricing and reselling them? I'd be very interested in hearing any opinions or experiences.