shape
carat
color
clarity

Please keep calling your reps

Well one of you has done it if you're afraid to socialize one-on-one with a man who is not your husband. I don't know any hardcore feminists that I can ask about your question. Why do you resort to passive aggressive behavior when you get uncomfortable? The people who are fighting for justice are, in my world, humans fighting for humans -- whether it is for women, LGBT community, or any other group. There are those who sit on the sidelines and reap the benefits of the hard work of others and there are those who are not content unless they are actively contributing to society in some way.

I am sorry that you took that as talking to you. I was trying to respond to Eliot. I respond to her the way she talks to me. If she wants to be aggressive then that is the response she gets.

Its not about being afraid. You assume too much on situations that you are not familiar with. And you are now telling me that I sit on the sidelines and not contributing? Some of the things I see hardcore people doing are not contributing in my view.
 
No one here is digging for anything. But this? THIS is a prime example of that slippery slope so many of us were worried about when these jokers took office. We all got wagging fingers in our faces about our liberal hysteria. Now what?

Please look up the difference between passionate and aggressive.
 
I am sorry that you took that as talking to you. I was trying to respond to Eliot. I respond to her the way she talks to me. If she wants to be aggressive then that is the response she gets.
And that is why most discussions on this board devolve into arguments. I wish we all would just try to discuss without antagonizing each other. Take the higher road.
 
I am not sure why his not dining with a woman alone that is not his wife is a negative thing. My husband wouldn't either. Some people have a traditional marriage and should not be denigrated for it.

Was a traditional marriage defined as not being able to have dinner with a woman friend? how about his sister in law? his sister? Seriously these kinds of old school ways of thinking hold women back.. so what's up next for him? my daughter can't go out unless I'm with her? what is the difference between this and being a muslim woman? Can't he keep it in his pants when he's out dining with a friend? Yes these are his ideas, old fashioned as they are and anti feminist, this way of thinking to young people is anathema.. we need forward thinking leaders not people from the early to mid 1900s. Red to me his way of thinking makes young women feel less and objects of 'sexual desire' rather than just a friend of a person. Not wanting to get into a tit for tat, it's just how I feel, your mileage varies. :)
 
Was a traditional marriage defined as not being able to have dinner with a woman friend? how about his sister in law? his sister? Seriously these kinds of old school ways of thinking hold women back.. so what's up next for him? my daughter can't go out unless I'm with her? what is the difference between this and being a muslim woman? Can't he keep it in his pants when he's out dining with a friend? Yes these are his ideas, old fashioned as they are and anti feminist, this way of thinking to young people is anathema.. we need forward thinking leaders not people from the early to mid 1900s. Red to me his way of thinking makes young women feel less and objects of 'sexual desire' rather than just a friend of a person. Not wanting to get into a tit for tat, it's just how I feel, your mileage varies. :)

I think this whole thing has been blown out of proportion from a single comment in 2002. Of course people should be able to be comfortable in doing whatever they want. It is up to a couple to decide what is comfortable. It is not for the whole world/US to decide how their marriage should be. But there are those who have to read a cause into everything someone does. That is tiresome for me. JMHO.
 
When you use a person's sexuality to take their humanity out of the equation, I have huge issues with that, yes.
 
I would like to see the wavey emoji retired and replaced by a middle finger salute emoji. Why beat around the bush when we can be direct:D
 
I would like to see the wavey emoji retired and replaced by a middle finger salute emoji. Why beat around the bush when we can be direct:D
Monnie and I were just having that conversation :lol:
 
I would like to see the wavey emoji retired and replaced by a middle finger salute emoji. Why beat around the bush when we can be direct:D

Is that what you think I meant? I didn't. It was more of a truce offer. I don't use that emoji except in a friendly truce kind of way. I guess I should take it differently when people use it to me?

Edit - I was the one who asked Andrey in the new forum thread about a middle finger emoji. If I mean that I would use it.
 
Last edited:
Or they don't feel the need to make mountains out of molehills. I wonder if it is terribly tiresome for hardcore feminists to be so angry all the time about all the ills that men (white men especially) cause? It is not something I desire to spend time on because I want to be happy and enjoy my life with my DH. Not worrying that he is putting me in my place subconsciously.

As a hard core feminist, I have to admit that I get tired of the barriers inherent in the continued casual sexism that exists where I live (which still seems miles ahead of many places in the US). Like the term "lady doctor" or the assumption that female lawyers, doctors, engineers are instead the secretary, nurse, or paralegal. Ask me how many times I've been asked to fetch coffee when I've gone to greet a male client in my waiting room. That men still get promoted more, paid more, and given instant authority and respect. Or feel that they can mansplain to me things that I have spent more than a decade of my life studying and they have literally zero expertise in (yes, I love it when some random older man tries to tell me how exactly to do my job). I also tire of the idea that feminism is about hating men rather than simply asking for equal rights and privileges. We are not treated equally yet. This remains a fact, even in more liberal places than the US.

I have to admit, I related to this (not the giving up drinking part, but the experience of sexism part):

https://qz.com/762868/giving-up-alc...-the-infuriating-truth-about-why-women-drink/

Also, this:

http://www.independent.co.uk/life-s...mean-doctors-ignore-womens-pain-a7157931.html

https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2015/10/emergency-room-wait-times-sexism/410515/

But I suspect this may me more whistling in the wind except to those who are already in the choir.
 
Or they don't feel the need to make mountains out of molehills. I wonder if it is terribly tiresome for hardcore feminists to be so angry all the time about all the ills that men (white men especially) cause? It is not something I desire to spend time on because I want to be happy and enjoy my life with my DH. Not worrying that he is putting me in my place subconsciously.

Why do you think feminists are angry????? I'm not angry, I'm energized. To say that feminists are angry is to attribute what YOU think of them, because they don't support YOUR values.. :) as a feminist I have lived thru the 70s (where men ruled and if the guy pulled my bra strap then hey WTF! it's a man's world) to the 80s where we made some inroads (where men pretended to respect me but just couldn't wait to get me in bed :( ) to the 90s where I stopped working to be home with my sons since it was cheaper for us than working to back into the workforce in 01 and men still ruled and women were seen as being 'hormonal' or 'agitated' or 'she misses her kids' or 'she's getting older'..

As to my husband having dinner with a woman, woman friend, acquaintance, why should I feel threatened? why should I want to go back to the time when my mother felt she needed to codeine her way out of a stifling marriage (50s).. no... and it all boils down to what one hears in their religious institution.. (which I learned years ago is just another place where men lord it over women in the guise of being paternal) not going back, don't want my DIL to go back, if I have a grand-daughter someday I don't want her to think she is anything less than a man. It's all about SEX anyway and men not being able to control themselves. :(
 
Is that what you think I meant? I didn't. It was more of a truce offer. I don't use that emoji except in a friendly truce kind of way. I guess I should take it differently when people use it to me?

Edit - I was the one who asked Andrey in the new forum thread about a middle finger emoji. If I mean that I would use it.
I think the meaning of the wavey emoji has changed for some of us due its use in threads that were contentious (I know I know, it's hard to believe that things can get heated here;)) so maybe it's better to use words unless the meaning of the wavey is crystal clear -- such as when we're obviously saying hello or good bye to someone.
 
As a hard core feminist, I have to admit that I get tired of the barriers inherent in the continued casual sexism that exists where I live (which still seems miles ahead of many places in the US). Like the term "lady doctor" or the assumption that female lawyers, doctors, engineers are instead the secretary, nurse, or paralegal. Ask me how many times I've been asked to fetch coffee when I've gone to greet a male client in my waiting room. That men still get promoted more, paid more, and given instant authority and respect. Or feel that they can mansplain to me things that I have spent more than a decade of my life studying and they have literally zero expertise in (yes, I love it when some random older man tries to tell me how exactly to do my job). I also tire of the idea that feminism is about hating men rather than simply asking for equal rights and privileges. We are not treated equally yet. This remains a fact, even in more liberal places than the US.

I have to admit, I related to this (not the giving up drinking part, but the experience of sexism part):

https://qz.com/762868/giving-up-alc...-the-infuriating-truth-about-why-women-drink/

Also, this:

http://www.independent.co.uk/life-s...mean-doctors-ignore-womens-pain-a7157931.html

https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2015/10/emergency-room-wait-times-sexism/410515/

But I suspect this may me more whistling in the wind except to those who are already in the choir.

Thank you for your perspective and it is appreciated. Will read the links later. I have been around for awhile and both careers were in highly male dominated fields. But if anyone had said those things to me I would have told them to eff off. But I could get away with that and I did with the older men I worked with. We developed a mutual respect because I demanded it. Old men are like that and when that generation dies off it might be better with regard to this issue. But I also appreciate that generation and their contributions to our world as we know it.
 
Why do you think feminists are angry????? I'm not angry, I'm energized. To say that feminists are angry is to attribute what YOU think of them, because they don't support YOUR values.. :) as a feminist I have lived thru the 70s (where men ruled and if the guy pulled my bra strap then hey WTF! it's a man's world) to the 80s where we made some inroads (where men pretended to respect me but just couldn't wait to get me in bed :( ) to the 90s where I stopped working to be home with my sons since it was cheaper for us than working to back into the workforce in 01 and men still ruled and women were seen as being 'hormonal' or 'agitated' or 'she misses her kids' or 'she's getting older'..

As to my husband having dinner with a woman, woman friend, acquaintance, why should I feel threatened? why should I want to go back to the time when my mother felt she needed to codeine her way out of a stifling marriage (50s).. no... and it all boils down to what one hears in their religious institution.. (which I learned years ago is just another place where men lord it over women in the guise of being paternal) not going back, don't want my DIL to go back, if I have a grand-daughter someday I don't want her to think she is anything less than a man. It's all about SEX anyway and men not being able to control themselves. :(

Kate I do understand all of that. It is different now IMO because the vitriol is worse. The all or nothing part of this discussion is what I don't like. I get the feeling that you (collective) are issuing an ultimatum that I am either with you or I am against you. That is far from the case. In order to make it better you have to realize that not everyone agrees with you (collective) and you make inroads when you can by not trying to eat the elephant all at once or demeaning women who do not agree with you totally.

I have already said that in my family my DH was laid off 1 month before our twins were born. He stayed home for 18 months instead of sending them to daycare because it was silly to pay more for daycare than he would make at whatever job he found in construction at the time. Plus it is better for a parent to be with kids if possible. So our family is hardly stuck in traditional roles. And we had no problem with it. Still don't.
 
Last edited:
Well one of you has done it if you're afraid to socialize one-on-one with a man who is not your husband. I don't know any hardcore feminists that I can ask about your question. Why do you resort to passive aggressive behavior when you get uncomfortable? The people who are fighting for justice are, in my world, humans fighting for humans -- whether it is for women, LGBT community, or any other group. There are those who sit on the sidelines and reap the benefits of the hard work of others and there are those who are not content unless they are actively contributing to society in some way.

Well I went out to feed the horses and thought about this comment you made. It made me kind of angry as it comes across very arrogant of you to sit in judgement of who you deem to be contributing to society and who does not. I hope I am misinterpreting?
 
Well I went out to feed the horses and thought about this comment you made. It made me kind of angry as it comes across very arrogant of you to sit in judgement of who you deem to be contributing to society and who does not. I hope I am misinterpreting?
I once put you on ignore because you had become, imo, overly defensive, emotionally reactive and judgmental in your responses so I know how you feel. I do make judgments as to what is more valuable to me and what I believe is more valuable to society. How is that arrogant? You do the same thing. EVERYONE does it. It's how we survive. I have a friend who risked her life for years in Africa working with African women trying to stop the practice of female genital mutilation. She has been in physical danger many times working in countries that are under siege by rebels. She willingly put her life at risk for a cause to which she is committed. She is now in a power position in the US working for a non profit that she took from small to huge through sheer grit and commitment raising tons of money for education programs about FGM and for medical care for girls and women who suffer the after effects. I value her contribution to society more than I value my own efforts working for non profits related to animal welfare. We both provide value through our work but in comparison, I am small potatoes. Those are the kinds of discernments I make.
 
Last edited:
I have to add this video discussion from The View because I am of the opinion of Bila and Hostin on this.

Jedediah Bila's been hanging out in some sketchy-ass bars in DC, if you ask me. I'm sure it's entirely impossible that she gets paid by The View to offer her highly skewed opinions on watering holes in DC. I, and others would be happy to recommend less "sleazy" places. There are quite a few. But I guess when you go searching for sleaze around every corner you are sure to find it. :lol:
 
I once put you on ignore because you had become, imo, overly defensive, emotionally reactive and judgmental in your responses so I know how you feel. I do make judgments as to what is more valuable to me and what I believe is more valuable to society. How is that arrogant? You do the same thing. EVERYONE does it. It's how we survive. I have a friend who risked her life for years in Africa working with African women trying to stop the practice of female genital mutilation. She has been in physical danger many times working in countries that are under seize by rebels. She willingly put her life at risk for a cause to which she is committed. She is now in a power position in the US working for a non profit that she took from small to huge through sheer grit and commitment raising tons of money for education programs about FGM and for medical care for girls and women who suffer the after effects. I value her contribution to society more than I value my own efforts working for non profits related to animal welfare. We both provide value through our work but in comparison, I am small potatoes. Those are the kinds of discernments I make.

LOL about the ignore. I have never put you on because we seem to manage without being too nasty. It has taken me some time to get used to such a liberal leaning forum and all the personalities that come with it. I am trying to be more affable in voicing my opinion but do fail at times.

We can admire such women and people who put themselves out there and I do immensely. Because someone does not do something similar does not mean they have no value to society or are not performing beneficial acts in their community with no recognition needed or given.
 
Red,

Women can be worse. With the older men they back down once they see that you are competent (or give it back to them). With women, they will go to their graves badmouthing you for doing exactly what your male colleagues would do.

But it's the subtle stuff that is the hardest to combat. Promotions, career advancement, training opportunities, workplace bullying (with nursing it's so bad it's called lateral violence and there's a whole area of study on it - it's something that is vastly disproportionate among female nurses towards other female nurses and towards female physicians), salary equity, perceived competence, reputation. Plus, female supervisors have been shown to rate same sex employees more poorly than opposite sex employees regardless of actual performance, as do female clients of female professionals (so sometimes we are part of the problem). This is in addition to men still making assumptions of reduced competence based on gender. Men are still given more weight in their testimony in court, in their opinions at work, and they still interrupt women disproportionately more in professional contexts (by about 25:1). I don't mean to make it sound like its insurmountable, as I've been successful despite it, but it would be nice if it just didn't exist.

I just finished reading John Krakauer's Missoula: Rape and the Justice System in a College Town. It was disturbing. My husband was most upset by the treatment of women by the justice system. While I found that upsetting as well (although not unexpected), I was shocked and saddened by how socialized (brainwashed?) young women in certain parts of the US still are about being nice, not causing trouble, and how naive they seem to be about issues of sexual violence. I was also surprised how the most angry and awful responses seemed to come from other women. It was an eye opener.
 
cmd2014 I totally understand and empathize that women can be worse. It is very sad. Probably half of the women who worked in my field at my location were terribly lazy or sleeping with coworkers. A couple even admitted that is why they chose the job in the first place. I never wanted to have a woman partner because of all the drama. Only one female supervisor stands out as a ball buster who did not take any BS from the females either. You did your job and it did not matter what gender you were. I liked working for her immensely. I got a totally nasty comment made to me awhile back for suggesting that women have issues they need to work out themselves but it is true and I am glad to hear you say it. It would be nice if none of this (men and women) crap existed.

I am almost through the Quartz article. Dang I did not realize that you could get booze in so many places?! :lol:
 
I just want to say that I am a Christian---and also a liberal. So please don't judge me on my religion and make assumptions that all Christians (or liberals) have the same views on everything.
There are a lot of variations of Christianity from Branch Davidians to Baptists to Evangelicals.

And some of them, in my opinion, give the rest of Christian people a bad name.
Christians can be pro-choice, and are not all homophobes.
Pence's version of Christianity is not my brand.
 
Yet passionate women who bust balls and navigate successfully through challenging work environments are labeled as being "aggressive."

Oh and please call your reps! Please!
 
Last edited:
I am almost through the Quartz article. Dang I did not realize that you could get booze in so many places?! :lol:

Neither did I! My liver has obviously been missing out!
 
Yet passionate women who bust balls and navigate successfully through challenging work environments are labeled as being "aggressive."

My comments are about you and how you speak to me personally. Has nothing to do with women being successful in their work environments. Its about discussing amicably. We have already determined that you and I get on each other's nerves.
 
My comments are about you and how you speak to me personally. Has nothing to do with women being successful in their work environments. Its about discussing amicably. We have already determined that you and I get on each other's nerves.
You can't read too much into my tone, because we are online. If I was sitting in front of you I would be telling you my exact same thoughts in most likely the exact same words, and I guarantee you'd interpret them differently. You ask Matata to clarify her comments while you wave your hand and label me aggressive.

Casual sexism is an extremely important topic. But to dismiss Pence's meddling in people's lives and health care is beyond unacceptable.
 
I don't think I dismissed it but the comment I responded to sure derailed your thread. Sorry about that.
 
I just want to say that I am a Christian---and also a liberal. So please don't judge me on my religion and make assumptions that all Christians (or liberals) have the same views on everything.
There are a lot of variations of Christianity from Branch Davidians to Baptists to Evangelicals.

And some of them, in my opinion, give the rest of Christian people a bad name.
Christians can be pro-choice, and are not all homophobes.
Pence's version of Christianity is not my brand.

Elizabeth,

I think you make a good and important point.
 
How does socializing with someone of the opposite sex confer disrespect on your spouse?

I also do not understand this at all. My husband has business meetings and friendships with women and goes to dinner alone with women and I have never once given it a second thought. I still meet men I used to work with for lunch or dinner and my husband hasn't ever had a problem. How the heck is having friendships with people of the opposite sex being disrespectful to your signicant other? Redwood and I are very close in age so it's not an age thing.
 
GET 3 FREE HCA RESULTS JOIN THE FORUM. ASK FOR HELP
Top