I am having a 5mm (guessing .5-.6) family stone set into a rose gold halo with approx .25tcw. I've decided to work with eternity by yoni. These are my two options. (Note I am not having diamonds on the shank or basket, just on the halo..
http://www.eternitybyyoni.com/engagement-rings/diamond-engagement-ring/Petite-Cathedral-Diamond-Halo-Ring-435.htm#
http://www.eternitybyyoni.com/engagement-rings/diamond-engagement-ring/Madison-Round-Halo-Ring-529.htm#
I'm wanting a soft delicate/floralesque looking ring that I will enjoy the profile of and while the Madison meets this brief in the stock image I am worried the Madison may be a bit angular/saucerish to be pretty in a small size especially without diamonds on the gallery. (I've attached a small stone version picture of a similar BGD ring to assist with visualising).
The petite cathedral appeals less to me in the cgi photo but I think with a couple of modifications could be nicer in a smaller size. - I would ask for the actual halo of the Madison instead and also would ask for the cathedral shoulders to be tucked under the halo vs to the side of it. In pictures I don't like cathedrals too much but in real life on my fingers I tend to prefer them.
I know this is a small boring ring by pricescope standards but I don't think I will ever upgrade and being in Australia plus going semi custom I don't have a chance to return so have to get it right, and I'm a Gemini so decisions are not my strong suit!!. I was quite set on the Madison but was looking at my hand yesterday and the thought of an angular saucer on it didn't appeal to me - I think the style loses some charm in small sizes? Any help or opinions are welcome. You are all so experienced and knowledgable and know jewellery fashion and trends and I need those kinds of opinions as my friends or partner can't see the importance in these minor differences!
http://www.eternitybyyoni.com/engagement-rings/diamond-engagement-ring/Petite-Cathedral-Diamond-Halo-Ring-435.htm#
http://www.eternitybyyoni.com/engagement-rings/diamond-engagement-ring/Madison-Round-Halo-Ring-529.htm#
I'm wanting a soft delicate/floralesque looking ring that I will enjoy the profile of and while the Madison meets this brief in the stock image I am worried the Madison may be a bit angular/saucerish to be pretty in a small size especially without diamonds on the gallery. (I've attached a small stone version picture of a similar BGD ring to assist with visualising).
The petite cathedral appeals less to me in the cgi photo but I think with a couple of modifications could be nicer in a smaller size. - I would ask for the actual halo of the Madison instead and also would ask for the cathedral shoulders to be tucked under the halo vs to the side of it. In pictures I don't like cathedrals too much but in real life on my fingers I tend to prefer them.
I know this is a small boring ring by pricescope standards but I don't think I will ever upgrade and being in Australia plus going semi custom I don't have a chance to return so have to get it right, and I'm a Gemini so decisions are not my strong suit!!. I was quite set on the Madison but was looking at my hand yesterday and the thought of an angular saucer on it didn't appeal to me - I think the style loses some charm in small sizes? Any help or opinions are welcome. You are all so experienced and knowledgable and know jewellery fashion and trends and I need those kinds of opinions as my friends or partner can't see the importance in these minor differences!