- Joined
- Jun 8, 2008
- Messages
- 56,284
You don't "have" to do anything, an insurance investigator is not law enforcement.MrsWhitney|1426712686|3849249 said:I have to do a videos and taped recording for 2 hours; they pulled all cameras around us; my husband has a separate interview for the same amount of time (so he is asking for time off his surgery rotation that day). When asked about how long this could last- I was told MANY months.
Well, they can indeed deny a claim for refusing to participate in the investigational interview or otherwise cooperate with, e.g., a request for the names of other possibly useful witnesses & to produce paperwork relating to the purchase/acquisition of the insured property. Those are among the insured's obligations under the policy.Karl_K|1426882559|3850260 said:You don't "have" to do anything, an insurance investigator is not law enforcement.
They can request that you do an interview but can not compel you to do so and can not legally deny your claim just for refusing.
is a misguided effort to be helpful. Of course, sexual advances, for example, should not be tolerated, but it is not unreasonable for them to ask repeated questions, seeking information from various angles & for the interview to be conducted under oath and recorded; as related in the 2008 PS post I linked previously, having the interview transcribed, and then asking you to review the transcript for accuracy, wouldn't be out of the ordinary either. Such does not give rise to any grounded basis for complaint or legal action.Karl_K|1426881759|3850254 said:If they make you uncomfortable or distressed in any way leave and contact an attorney and the state insurance commission.
As much as they like to think otherwise they have no standing to put any one under oath they are not law enforcement nor agents of the court involved in a legal proceeding.MollyMalone|1426889557|3850320 said:under oath
They would really hate to try and defend that in court that a 2 hour interrogation is a reasonable obligation to a policy holder.MollyMalone|1426889557|3850320 said:Well, they can indeed deny a claim for refusing to participate in the investigational interview or otherwise cooperate with, e.g., a request for the names of other possibly useful witnesses & to produce paperwork relating to the purchase/acquisition of the insured property. Those are among the insured's obligations under the policy.Karl_K|1426882559|3850260 said:You don't "have" to do anything, an insurance investigator is not law enforcement.
They can request that you do an interview but can not compel you to do so and can not legally deny your claim just for refusing.
A bank to whom you apply for a mortgage is neither law enforcement nor an agent of a court involved in a legal proceeding, but what happens if you refuse to subscribe, under penalty of perjury, your mortgage application? The bank won"t accept it for processing.Karl_K|1426892543|3850358 said:As much as they like to think otherwise they have no standing to put any one under oath they are not law enforcement nor agents of the court involved in a legal proceeding.
The have no powers other than any other person has when talking to another person.
That would be a Unsworn declaration would it not?MollyMalone|1426896089|3850392 said:A bank to whom you apply for a mortgage is neither law enforcement nor an agent of a court involved in a legal proceeding, but what happens if you refuse to subscribe, under penalty of perjury, your mortgage application? The bank won"t accept it for processing.Karl_K|1426892543|3850358 said:As much as they like to think otherwise they have no standing to put any one under oath they are not law enforcement nor agents of the court involved in a legal proceeding.
The have no powers other than any other person has when talking to another person.
Which is why I did not say to not do it and within reason to go along with it and give a voluntary statement.MollyMalone|1426896089|3850392 said:Let me put this another way: if someone were come to me (a lawyer) and tell me they want to sue their insurance company because it declined to pay out on a claimed loss, and in the course of our consultation, I learn that they refused to participate in the standard, initial investigation & that they want me to "take their case" on a contingency fee basis, I would decline (and kindly explain why),
Oh, I burst out laughing upon seeing your "Let the apartment cleaning commence" & wink 'cause I too would feel the need to get my apartment ready to receive strangers (or my mother, were she still alive; I did not inherit her enthusiastic zeal for all matters of housework!)MrsWhitney|1426912283|3850476 said:Molly_Malone- I do see where you are coming from; however I do have a sense that I am going into this meeting already presumed guilty; when in fact, jewelry that was lost- some of equally high value was not yet insured (I know, tsk tsk on me). I wish Jewelers Mutual and Perfect Circle had more than 1 claims investigator for NYC.
I like that my husband will be home with me- although in a separate room.
Let the apartment cleaning commence![]()