shape
carat
color
clarity

Opinions on this setting?

djjosh

Rough_Rock
Joined
Dec 4, 2022
Messages
16
I'm thinking of pairing this setting in platinum with a lab grown round ~2.5 ct diamond. Is this setting good? Do you like it? What would you prefer if you don't like it. I don't want any additional stones on the actual round ring portion. But hidden halos are ok.

 
It’s 1.8 mm which is thin. Personally I would find a vendor near you who would set your Ritani diamond in their setting. I don’t find Ritani settings all that sturdy.
 
It’s 1.8 mm which is thin. Personally I would find a vendor near you who would set your Ritani diamond in their setting. I don’t find Ritani settings all that sturdy.


Thanks, I was thinking that, but the prices are actually quite a bit higher with local vendors.
 
It’s 1.8 mm which is thin. Personally I would find a vendor near you who would set your Ritani diamond in their setting. I don’t find Ritani settings all that sturdy.


How thick should it be?
 
I think anything over 2-3 mm is fine. I got a 1.8 from them and sent it back.
 
Setting styles are so subjective as far as like or disliking. That size stone , I’d go with a thicker band as well. I’ve seen diamonds by Lauren do a nice hidden halo but the first picture you posted gives me turtle neck vibes which in my opinion takes away from the center that should be the show stopper. I like the second one better. At the end of the day, pick something you’ll be happy with.
 

Sharing in case this helps: F73E76A4-F820-484C-966B-2D14FB1533B1.jpeg
I just got this one from James Allen (link above). Both setting and wedding band are 2mm. The hidden halo detail is a mix of what you shared — a small halo collar at base plus larger halo just below girdle. For reference, this is a size 4.75 finger size in platinum, with 2.08 ct center stone.
F73E76A4-F820-484C-966B-2D14FB1533B1.jpeg
 

Attachments

  • B397C99D-D529-4B9A-84B2-783DF3D8E995.jpeg
    B397C99D-D529-4B9A-84B2-783DF3D8E995.jpeg
    120.7 KB · Views: 13
  • 62B6D2BE-255F-4F98-B3B2-96B305E6A909.jpeg
    62B6D2BE-255F-4F98-B3B2-96B305E6A909.jpeg
    199.9 KB · Views: 24
  • B62C4FF3-B321-4097-8B11-89861C09858D.jpeg
    B62C4FF3-B321-4097-8B11-89861C09858D.jpeg
    183 KB · Views: 25
  • 18D0AD6C-47C5-4142-AF4C-72BE19091466.jpeg
    18D0AD6C-47C5-4142-AF4C-72BE19091466.jpeg
    137.1 KB · Views: 23
Looks amazing! I want something like that but without the stones are the ring part.
 

Sharing in case this helps: F73E76A4-F820-484C-966B-2D14FB1533B1.jpeg
I just got this one from James Allen (link above). Both setting and wedding band are 2mm. The hidden halo detail is a mix of what you shared — a small halo collar at base plus larger halo just below girdle. For reference, this is a size 4.75 finger size in platinum, with 2.08 ct center stone.
F73E76A4-F820-484C-966B-2D14FB1533B1.jpeg

What's the width of that diamond in mm? IT looks huge for only 2 ct.
 
Setting styles are so subjective as far as like or disliking. That size stone , I’d go with a thicker band as well. I’ve seen diamonds by Lauren do a nice hidden halo but the first picture you posted gives me turtle neck vibes which in my opinion takes away from the center that should be the show stopper. I like the second one better. At the end of the day, pick something you’ll be happy with.

Can you post one from Lauren?
 
Here are a couple I grabbed off their Facebook. These are a more simple style but they can do any custom piece and their prices are reasonable.
C87213D0-7B66-486B-A35E-8261E8BFB299.jpeg
 

Attachments

  • 8BDE1BA4-01F5-4A9E-BEA6-3A7620878B46.jpeg
    8BDE1BA4-01F5-4A9E-BEA6-3A7620878B46.jpeg
    140.8 KB · Views: 32
For the size of 2-3mm which you recommend I assume you mean ring width and not ring thickness?

ring-thickness-vs-width-difference.png
 
For the size of 2-3mm which you recommend I assume you mean ring width and not ring thickness?

ring-thickness-vs-width-difference.png

That is what I was referring to, yes.
 
What's the width of that diamond in mm? IT looks huge for only 2 ct.

That is the magic of photos. It does not look that large in real life. Its 8.17 x 8.22.
My fingers are much smaller IRL as well - size 4.75 finger.

Added here a side-by-side with 1.5 ct mined RB.
73A0F8F0-906B-473A-BC0F-87D04ED06036.jpeg
 
That is the magic of photos. It does not look that large in real life. Its 8.17 x 8.22.
My fingers are much smaller IRL as well - size 4.75 finger.

Added here a side-by-side with 1.5 ct mined RB.
73A0F8F0-906B-473A-BC0F-87D04ED06036.jpeg

Do you think a 9 mm round diamond on a size 4 finger (15 mm width) will look too big? Almost gaudy?
 
Not at all!
 
GET 3 FREE HCA RESULTS JOIN THE FORUM. ASK FOR HELP

Featured Topics

Top