OK, let me try it again... WOW ! ! !

[Stephan]

Can you people see something now ?

 

[jlim]

just for you

 

[Stephan]

Thank you, you are so cute, jlim !!!

 

[jlim]

Err.. that's just an avatar

 

[Garry H (Cut Nut)]

Great - but the stone Sarin data is wrong

The light return, fire and Scint results for this stone are common for quite a large range of proportions - but what is unusual about this stone is that stones with these crown pav and table sizes have greater depth %.
This stone has just managed to sneak through. If you drop the depth % from 58% to 57.8% you will see a warning that the girdle is too thin.
Actualy this stone can not exist with the parameters given unless it has a negative girdle.

Sorry to piddle on your Bonfire Jimm

 

[Garry H (Cut Nut)]

HCA 0.3 with a depth of 59.3 would be an aceptable minimum girdle thickness for this stone.