- Joined
- Apr 3, 2004
- Messages
- 33,852
I understand the comment "Clarity grade is based on clouds that are not shown" but how about "additional clouds not shown on VS stones"? how horrible can it be on VS stones?@Dancing Fire I had posted a similar thread awhile back, but this current one has a lot of traction with input from the trade: https://www.pricescope.com/communit...t-shown”-what-does-this-sentence-mean.240816/
I understand the comment "Clarity grade is based on clouds that are not shown" but how about "additional clouds not shown on VS stones"? how horrible can it be on VS stones?![]()
additional clouds not shown on VS stones? how bad can it be on VS stones?. It seem like almost impossible to find an SI - VS stone w/o the word "clouds" on the lab report.
Is it possible if someone could post some photographs of a cloud?
Thank you.
https://www.google.com/search?rlz=1...1c.1.64.img..5.4.573....0.cvD7NzIIOpw#imgrc=_Is it possible if someone could post some photographs of a cloud?
I love to take videos of my diamonds and send them to prospective clients. I have never been able to convincingly capture a "cloud not shown". Pinpoints are also hard to capture, but with significant enough magnification I can. Since clouds are tiny pinpoints it would seem to make sense that I could capture them convincingly, but at high magnification they look like tiny stars in the sky, not clouds.
Of course, if they were the kind of cloud that would interfere with light performance, they would not be in the brand that I sell, so that may be part of the reason they are so hard to convincingly capture.
Wink