- Sep 18, 2011
That's exactly the thought I had. Unless that's the look you want.Gypsy|1317240203|3028109 said:
I think she means over the edges of her finger...like covering more than just the ring fingercanuk-gal|1317242010|3028150 said:
HI:slg47|1317245138|3028192 said:I think she means over the edges of her finger...like covering more than just the ring fingercanuk-gal|1317242010|3028150 said:
I think a gorgeous stone of that (huge! ) size in a solitaire setting on your petite fingers would look classic, elegant, and gorgeous. I think a huge rock in that uber blingy setting you posted would not look as tasteful. Then again, i think Kim Kardashian's wedding set looks ridiculous, whereas I'm sure many people here would give their left leg for it, so maybe that's just me! Everyone has their own personal preferences, but I really don't think you could go wrong with a solitaire and a nice rock. maybe get a band with some pave to bling it up a bit without contributing too much to the diameter...tenyearanniversary|1317295558|3028614 said:Honestly at this point, I'm thinking about just setting the stone in a double claw four prong solitaire because I just cannot decide
+1 I think this would be amazing on a 4 carat stone. I'm not really loving the double halo.Gypsy|1317323936|3028926 said:How about this? http://jewelsbyericagrace.smugmug.com/JbEG-Signature-Settings-and/Halos/The-Bella-Halo-Featuring-a-9mm/16713089_WPwSgd#1282709088_3gNWrmp I love it and it would be comfortable. And it's vintagey.